- Joined
- Aug 27, 2003
I'm really enjoying Paul's commentary. Listening to him, I feel like I'm really learning something. I like the way he gets into specifics, such as talking about individual steps, head movements, and musical phrasing. These are things other commentators don't talk about much, or at least not in such detail.
I also enjoy Susie's commentary to some extent, but I find her a little inconsistent. For example, I remember a few years ago when Chait and Sakhnovky were doing really well, Susie had nothing but good things to say about their skating. Then, when they dropped back down to 5th or 6th in the world, she suddenly started saying that their basic skating technique needed improvement. Which just made me wonder: Why didn't she say that before?
I also enjoy Susie's commentary to some extent, but I find her a little inconsistent. For example, I remember a few years ago when Chait and Sakhnovky were doing really well, Susie had nothing but good things to say about their skating. Then, when they dropped back down to 5th or 6th in the world, she suddenly started saying that their basic skating technique needed improvement. Which just made me wonder: Why didn't she say that before?