Lipinskifan19 said:Hnmmm, not sure if it's such a good idea to go to Carol Heiss. I mean, she's already a great jumper. I wonder how things would turn out if she went to Robin?
Vash01 said:Carol Heiss has not had any success at all as a coach. Tonia K.'s best finish at worlds was around 7th or 8th, IIRC. Tim Goebel certainly learned the jumps but he had no artistry when he trained with Carol. Lisa Erwin made the world team in 91 but she quit skating a few years later. Aaron (can't remember last name) never made the US mens podium at nationals.
I don't understand why Miki decided to go to her. What she needs is artistry, not jumps. Is it possible that other coaches were not available to coach?
Vash
Piel
Tonia Kwiakowski(SP?) had great artistry under Heiss. Where did you find the story? I went to the link, hit English but found nothing about skating????
Just because her skaters have not won a World Championship title (yet), that doesn't mean she is not a very good coach. Without Sarah Hughes, who had an extremely flawed technique, where would Robin Wagner be? Who was Richard Callaghan before he found Todd Eldridge? If it wasn't for Michael Jiranik's work with Kurt Browning (3 World titles) before Kurt moved to Louis Stong, Stong would still be waiting for his first singles skater of consequence let alone a World Champion. And so it goes with all coaches. Some get lucky early and find a student with all the necessary components: talent, coachability and determination, others go a lifetime without ever finding their Brian Boitano. IMO, it certainly cannot hurt Miki to work with someone who has as much going for them as CHJ does, loads of experience (personal and professional), personal style and sophistication, and apparently a real appreciation of her students and the sport.Carol Heiss has not had any success at all as a coach.
It's Richard Callaghan. Frank Carrol is most well known for coaching Michelle Kwan for ten years.Who was Frank Callaghan before he found Todd Eldridge?
Joesitz said:You have to remember a coach can give a skater so much but when it comes to the moment of truth, it is the skater who has to utilize all that training in front of the judges.
Joe
I agree. In the hands of a more artistic skater, Miki's "Firebird" program could have been a stunner -- the potential was there. Unfortunately, Miki is not an artistic skater.Yes! The "Firebird" choreography was fine, but Miki hadn't a clue what to do with it. Miki's #1 problem is she is about as musical as a fence post. You could have a team of choreographers come up with a program perfect for Miki's skating skills, but she still wouldn't be able to perform it as intended.
lotusland said:As Vash01 and others have said:
Just because her skaters have not won a World Championship title (yet), that doesn't mean she is not a very good coach. Without Sarah Hughes, who had an extremely flawed technique, where would Robin Wagner be? Who was Richard Callaghan before he found Todd Eldridge? If it wasn't for Michael Jiranik's work with Kurt Browning (3 World titles) before Kurt moved to Louis Stong, Stong would still be waiting for his first singles skater of consequence let alone a World Champion. And so it goes with all coaches. Some get lucky early and find a student with all the necessary components: talent, coachability and determination, others go a lifetime without ever finding their Brian Boitano. IMO, it certainly cannot hurt Miki to work with someone who has as much going for them as CHJ does, loads of experience (personal and professional), personal style and sophistication, and apparently a real appreciation of her students and the sport.
Why don't we all just wait and see how Miki's month with Carol goes and let the skater/federation decide if this is the right move?
ChiSk8Fan said:The negative responses to this choice are puzzling because, IMHO, it seems like a lot of people don't know or understand enough about SO many things to have any sort of valid opinions.