Page 1 of 3 1 2 3 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 42

Thread: Another edge question

  1. #1
    Custom Title Mathman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    Detroit, Michigan
    Posts
    28,190

    Question Another edge question

    I was trying to construct the maximum-valued program under the CoP, and I ran into a problem. In a jump combination, the second jump must take off from the landing edge of the first jump.

    Question 1: Does this mean that you can only do a loop or a toe-loop as the second jump?

    Question 2: In a jump sequence you can do a hop or turn (no more than one revolution) between jumps. Could you do a double Axel as your second jump in a jump sequence?

    Here's what I've got so far, for my eight allowed jumping passes.

    4A-4T (22.5 points)
    4Lz-4Lo (21.0 points)
    2A-2A-2A SEQ (9.9 points -- only three combos/sequences are allowed, only one with three jumps.)
    4A (13.0 points)
    4Lz (11.0 points -- only two jumps may be repeated.)
    4F (10.5)
    4S (9.5 points)

    Now I think I'm Zayaked out (only two triple/quad jumps may be repeated), so I can't think of anything more to do except throw in a hydroplane into a 'Tano double Axel for my eighth pass (3.3 points).

    This gives me 97.4 base mark points on my jump elements. This goes up to 107.1 if I do them all in the last third of the program.

    Can anyone beat that?

    MM

  2. #2
    Custom Title boggartlaura's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Posts
    155
    Quote Originally Posted by Mathman
    I was trying to construct the maximum-valued program under the CoP, and I ran into a problem. In a jump combination, the second jump must take off from the landing edge of the first jump.

    Question 1: Does this mean that you can only do a loop or a toe-loop as the second jump?

    Question 2: In a jump sequence you can do a hop or turn (no more than one revolution) between jumps. Could you do a double Axel as your second jump in a jump sequence?
    1) Generally, yes. There are skaters who can do jumps in both directions, so I suppose they could do an opposite-direction lutz, but they are very rare. Alternatively, you could do a jump the land on the other foot, like an one-foot Axel, but I don't know if those get credit under CoP.

    2) You can do any jump as the second part of a sequence.

    ETA: You'd be better off doing a 3A-3T-3Lo combination.
    Last edited by boggartlaura; 07-08-2005 at 03:24 PM.

  3. #3
    Custom Title
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Posts
    3,853
    Quote Originally Posted by Mathman
    Question 2: In a jump sequence you can do a hop or turn (no more than one revolution) between jumps. Could you do a double Axel as your second jump in a jump sequence?
    Yes, but . . . the latest rule updates added the following clarification:

    Two or more Axel jumps Axel type jumps in a row without any connecting hop, mazurka or any other non-listed jump is not a jump sequence, but two separate jumps.
    In other words, if you just did double axel, step forward from the landing into double axel, step forward again into another double axel, that would count as three separate elements, not as a three-jump sequence.

    Double axel-mazurka jump-double axel would count as a sequence though, and the same if you added a second mazurka and third double axel.

    There's also another little hop called a tap toe (like a mazurka, but without crossing the legs and often done from a back inside rather than back outside edge) that would also work here. Axel-tap toe-axel is pretty common at the pre-preliminary and preliminary levels.

    It's not clear from this rule whether non-axel triple, step forward to double axel would count as a sequence. My guess is that it will be called as one this season if anyone does it, and then they'll rewrite the rule to clarify that that should be counted as two separate jumps too.

  4. #4
    Custom User Title CDMM1991's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Nova Scotia, Canada
    Posts
    1,220
    What about 3A 3A 3A? instead of 2A2A2A

  5. #5
    Forum translator Ptichka's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Boston, MA
    Posts
    4,430
    Quote Originally Posted by CDMM1991
    What about 3A 3A 3A? instead of 2A2A2A
    Zayak - you can't have more than 2 of the same type of a triple or quad jump, one of them in combo/ seq.

  6. #6
    Custom User Title CDMM1991's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Nova Scotia, Canada
    Posts
    1,220
    Oh okay Ptichka, how about 3a 3a 3l?

  7. #7
    Forum translator Ptichka's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Boston, MA
    Posts
    4,430
    Quote Originally Posted by CDMM1991
    Oh okay Ptichka, how about 3a 3a 3l?
    In MathMan's proposal, there is already both a 4A-4T combo, and a standalone 3A.

  8. #8
    Custom Title
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Posts
    3,853
    Well, since he's got all those quads, and the repeated jumps are quads, he can do whatever triples he wants and won't be repeating any more jumps. Triples and quads are not the same jumps.

    In theory, that is. There's no one alive today, certainly not Mathman himself, who could land all those different quads within the space of 4 1/2 minutes, with spins and steps in between. Someday, maybe. By which time the rules are sure to have changed.

    Meanwhile, if you repeat quads and also do triples of the same takeoff, you risk getting doubly or triply penalized if the quads are underrotated and called as triples.

  9. #9
    Forum translator Ptichka's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Boston, MA
    Posts
    4,430
    gkelly, are you sure? Do you mean that you can do a quad toe, and then 2 triple toes in combos (a very realistic scenario)?

  10. #10
    Custom Title
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Posts
    3,853
    Yup. Look at the protocols from this year's Worlds. Chengjiang Li got credit for just that (well, one of the triple toes wasn't in combo). And Stephane Lambiel got credit for two quad toes and one triple toe.

  11. #11
    Forum translator Ptichka's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Boston, MA
    Posts
    4,430
    Quote Originally Posted by Mathman
    2A-2A-2A SEQ (9.9 points)
    Actually, this is not correct. In a sequence, only the top two jumps count; also, the result is then multiplied by 0.8. Therefore, such sequence would only be worth 5.28

  12. #12
    Forum translator Ptichka's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Boston, MA
    Posts
    4,430
    All right, here is my maximum. This takes into account what gkelly said about a triple and a quad counting as separate jumps

    1. 4Fl + 4Lo + 4Toe (29.5)
    2. 4A + 4Lo (23)
    3. 4Lz + 4Toe (20)
    4. 4A (13)
    5. 4Lz (11)
    6. 4Fl (10.5)
    7. 4Sal (9.5)
    8. 3A (7.5)

    Total: 124 (136.4 if in last third)

  13. #13
    Custom Title boggartlaura's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Posts
    155
    Quote Originally Posted by Ptichka
    All right, here is my maximum. This takes into account what gkelly said about a triple and a quad counting as separate jumps

    1. 4Fl + 4Lo + 4Toe (29.5)
    2. 4A + 4Lo (23)
    3. 4Lz + 4Toe (20)
    4. 4A (13)
    5. 4Lz (11)
    6. 4Fl (10.5)
    7. 4Sal (9.5)
    8. 3A (7.5)

    Total: 124 (136.4 if in last third)
    You violated the Zayak rule - you repeated five jumps, and you can only repeat two.

  14. #14
    Custom Title Mathman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    Detroit, Michigan
    Posts
    28,190
    Quote Originally Posted by Ptichka
    Actually, this is not correct. In a sequence, only the top two jumps count; also, the result is then multiplied by 0.8. Therefore, such sequence would only be worth 5.28
    Can this be right? What if you did 3Lz+2T+2T. That's 6.0 for the Lutz + 1.3 for the first double toe, all times .8, for a total of 5.84 for the whole sequence.

    This is less than if you did the triple Lutz by itself.

    MM

  15. #15
    Forum translator Ptichka's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Boston, MA
    Posts
    4,430
    Quote Originally Posted by Mathman
    Can this be right? What if you did 3Lz+2T+2T. That's 6.0 for the Lutz + 1.3 for the first double toe, all times .8, for a total of 5.84 for the whole sequence.

    This is less than if you did the triple Lutz by itself.
    Yah, the first time I read the rules, I thought it was very clear that ISU wanted to all but outlaw sequences. Indeed, many (such as Irina) did tend to abuse them.

Page 1 of 3 1 2 3 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Discussion - Is Sasha's Skating Brittle or Fragile?
    By Joesitz in forum 2004-05 Figure Skating archives
    Replies: 339
    Last Post: 06-25-2005, 10:56 PM
  2. Question about jumps: the Wally
    By emma in forum 2004-05 Figure Skating archives
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: 03-28-2005, 11:24 AM
  3. Men - Short Program - Notes
    By Rosaleen in forum 2004-05 Figure Skating archives
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 03-05-2005, 09:07 AM
  4. Euros Day 4 report - ladies SP and dance FD
    By LizK in forum 2004-05 Figure Skating archives
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 01-29-2005, 09:01 AM
  5. Tech question: Edge spins
    By Mathman3 in forum 2002-03 Figure Skating archives
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 04-26-2003, 06:13 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •