Diva, there is also another question. No one cared about Steuer's past while he was just another coach. It wasn't until he started coaching one of the best pairs in the world that someone who's been sitting on the information all those years decided to come forth.
This case bothers me on many levels. I'll try to explain if you forgive some pathos here. There are two issues - one is the legality of his case, and I won't even comment on that since I only know what I've read in articles. The other, though, is the question of "right" vs "wrong" and "good" vs "evil". The argument that "he had no choice"... It does have more than a grain of truth in it (though if reports are true, he did far more than was strictly necessary to get the authorities off his back). However, it still doesn't make it "right". And it bothers me that I don't think Steuer sees his former actions as "bad". Look, I've all done things we regret; I think, though, that we do them with an understanding that they are bad, and that if we get caught we'll pay the price. It would mollify me a great deal if Steuer said even something like "I was young, I thought I had no choice, and I therefore acted badly; I wish circumstances were different and I hadn't done it." In other words, I'm not opposed to excuses, what bothers me is the lack of recognition of the "wrong" of this. This blurs the boundaries for everyone - and that, I believe, is bad for everyone's morals.