Pairs - short program | Page 2 | Golden Skate

Pairs - short program

cornell08

Final Flight
Joined
May 10, 2009
E/L's short:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wISIF7VdhJs

I love this program for them, though they need to change the latter part of the choreography-- the death spiral does NOT go with the music there. Love their speed though; my favorite American pair with C/Y in second.

C/Y's short:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HF-TURY11PE
They've improved alot, but need way more speed on their footwork seq. John's posture has improved too actually, but it gets awry again during lifts and spins-- when your partner is Caitlin with her beautiful back positions, any hunching over really shows.
 
Last edited:

LLLLutz

Rinkside
Joined
Mar 22, 2009
Cong and Sui are in second because they have the most 'complex' choreography that allows them to really get into character, even if it may seem 'juniorish'. I recall similar reactions to Oda's Chaplin last year. The difficult transitions (even if they may be one too many...and they need to stop the constant lasso-arm thing) increase the difficulty of all the required elements since you have more to worry about before every throw, jump etc and you have to pull it off as if it were only an afterthought. Also they didn't fall on one of the big required elements. They skate with great speed, ice coverage, and have huge throws. This is why they are in second, though I believe they ought to be in first. I really enjoyed their program, actually.
Sui & Han do indeed have program filled with transitions, but there is no actual skating - it's tricks and more tricks in between. Their basics are poor, espesially hers and the program is designed to hide it with the lots of going on there. They also lack very much in unison, as well as in lines. There is a couple of years ahead of them to learn and maybe they will deserve some 6 and 7th in skating skills one day, but not yet.
 

Tonichelle

Idita-Rock-n-Roll
Record Breaker
Joined
Jun 27, 2003
I have also just arrived home from CoC. Based on what I saw, I think the judges' order is correct, although I don't agree with the score spread of the top 5. Pang/Tong didn't have their finest skate technically (and they were 4th in TES), but the overall quality of skating was clearly above any other pair out there, and PCS rightfully on top which puts them in #1 but not way out there. I like their program. Sui/Han: this pair had more energy and presence than any of the more senior teams, aided by music and choreography that was appropriate for their ages, skills, and style. They made me grin the entire way through the program--and that's not easy for a skater to do (I'm more likely to be grimacing). Even with the fall (which happened right in front of me), they got right back into it. I could have sworn they did a triple twist rather than a double like everyone else--possibly my eyes deceived me but we'll wait for protocols to see why those TES were highest. I think their PCS was too high on the SS/TR dimensions by at least a couple of points. I would have had them neck and neck with Yankowskas/Coughlin, with YC deserving their PCS or even a bit better. They did a great job, considering in the warm up she was really struggling with the SBS jumps. I did not think I/M's performance was boring, but I'm not fond of the music/program. They had good speed and managed to keep up their energy all the way through. I thought their marks were fair. I was (pleasantly) surprised that they were able to skate this well with no apparent loss of stamina, after arriving here from from Canada just a couple of days ago.

Evora/Ladwig had a nice program but they seemed a little "tight" and maybe a tad flat emotionally. I think their PCS marks are way too low--I don't see how they could have been scored lower than about 25.0. Next to last in PCS? Definitely not. They ABSOLUTELY should have PCS above the Italians and Dong/Wu. IMO, this was the most glaring screw-over of the pairs short, so not sure what to make of this. D-M/K pretty much powered through their program, but there was nothing special or memorable, and there skating is fairly one dimensional without nuance. A little sloppy in the last half. Maybe it's the music/choreo, I knew very little about them coming into this comp. Dong/Wu had some good elements but spins were not and it looked like getting her into the lift was a slight struggle. BTW, her hair was very distracting--she needs to either cut it way short, or get it pinned back and under control. The mini-Yuko Kavaguti look doesn't work for me. The orchestration of their music is too heavy with percussion, something about it clashes with their skating style. Hole/Johnson didn't look comfortable at all--I was expecting better. He looks like a much stronger basic skater than she. Their music choice doesn't do them any favors. I'm hoping it's all just a case of jet lag for them.

Thank you so very much for the review! I envy your ability to be there! :rock:
 

UnChosen

On the Ice
Joined
Dec 12, 2006
Sui & Han do indeed have program filled with transitions, but there is no actual skating - it's tricks and more tricks in between. Their basics are poor, espesially hers and the program is designed to hide it with the lots of going on there. They also lack very much in unison, as well as in lines. There is a couple of years ahead of them to learn and maybe they will deserve some 6 and 7th in skating skills one day, but not yet.

Program component score rewards difficulty and variety as well as execution, emotional involvement and lots of other things. To be honest I'll glad that complex choreographies are getting rewarded because it encourages more variety in programs. Pairs skating nowadays are getting more and more about choosing the slowest "romantic" music to skate to with "good lines" but ignore everything else in the presentation.
 

LLLLutz

Rinkside
Joined
Mar 22, 2009
Program component score rewards difficulty and variety as well as execution, emotional involvement and lots of other things. To be honest I'll glad that complex choreographies are getting rewarded because it encourages more variety in programs. Pairs skating nowadays are getting more and more about choosing the slowest "romantic" music to skate to with "good lines" but ignore everything else in the presentation.

Difficulty and variety have to be also attractive, with good lines, good flow etc. I didn't see anything difficult or innovative in their program - mostly dance lifts- nothing particulary interesting or difficult- and everything was very sloppy.
I actually liked the idea of the program and how it fits them, but they didn't deserve the scores they got.
 

doubleflutz

On the Ice
Joined
Oct 20, 2010
Sui/Han: this pair had more energy and presence than any of the more senior teams, aided by music and choreography that was appropriate for their ages, skills, and style. They made me grin the entire way through the program--and that's not easy for a skater to do (I'm more likely to be grimacing). Even with the fall (which happened right in front of me), they got right back into it. I could have sworn they did a triple twist rather than a double like everyone else--possibly my eyes deceived me but we'll wait for protocols to see why those TES were highest.

Are you sure they didn't do a quad twist when everyone else did a triple? They attempted it at their Junior Worlds, as well as throw quad sal. I/M certainly looked like they did a triple twist to me, although that's the only program I've watched. S/H doing a quad twist and perhaps even a quad throw would go quite a ways towards explaining the TES lead.
 

Hikaru

Final Flight
Joined
Sep 23, 2004
Sui & Han do indeed have program filled with transitions, but there is no actual skating - it's tricks and more tricks in between. Their basics are poor, espesially hers and the program is designed to hide it with the lots of going on there. They also lack very much in unison, as well as in lines. There is a couple of years ahead of them to learn and maybe they will deserve some 6 and 7th in skating skills one day, but not yet.

Well, they are what? 15 and 18 years old I think, I expect that they have many many years ahead to improve those areas. What I like about them the most is that they interpret the music, they show body language, which for a chinese team is a surprise at such a young age, I mean if I compare them to the Zhangs (whom I still dream to see skating with real emotion), these kids have definitely worked on one thing that was hard for the previous teams. They are takng a page out of the Shen and Zhao book, and I can only hope that they keep improving year after year.
 

lavender

Record Breaker
Joined
Jul 26, 2003
It's been awhile since I've been into American pairs until today. I've never notice Caitlin Yankowskas and John Coughlin. They were quite impressive here. They have the presentation and style of all the U.S. pairs imo to be the top pair but I guess they are not consistent enough in the long.

They need to work on spins, speed in fw. John needs to be a little be stronger and stretch. I do notice his posture.
 
Last edited:

gold12345

Medalist
Joined
Dec 14, 2007
Are you sure they didn't do a quad twist when everyone else did a triple? They attempted it at their Junior Worlds, as well as throw quad sal. I/M certainly looked like they did a triple twist to me, although that's the only program I've watched. S/H doing a quad twist and perhaps even a quad throw would go quite a ways towards explaining the TES lead.

They tried a quad twist at a Jr Grand Prix and it was underrotated and just not well executed. It received a lot of -GOE. They definitely didn't do it today.
 

Tonichelle

Idita-Rock-n-Roll
Record Breaker
Joined
Jun 27, 2003
Universal Sports is broadcasting the short right now (TV)! Caitlyn and John improved over NHK! Can't wait to see what they do at Nationals this year! :rock:
 

museksk8r

Record Breaker
Joined
Oct 31, 2006
Country
United-States
How in the world did Pang/Tong win that SP?! :confused: I counted 5 noticeable errors and would have had them down in 5th place. Ewww, the Patrick Chan of pairs skating! :disapp::scowl: Why is no one jumping on the Chinese skating federation the way they did Skate Canada over the Patrick Chan gross over-scoring? At least Chan wasn't allowed to win the SP the way P/T did. P/T were :eek: . . . unbelievably bad!
 
Last edited:

lavender

Record Breaker
Joined
Jul 26, 2003
I guess I'll watch pang and tong later. I'm not interested in them so I didn't watch. I don't know why they have never impressed me. S/Z were it for me of the Chinese pairs. Maybe someone similar will come along again some day
 

UnChosen

On the Ice
Joined
Dec 12, 2006
How in the world did Pang/Tong win that SP?! :confused: I counted 5 noticeable errors and would have had them down in 5th place. Ewww, the Patrick Chan of pairs skating! :disapp::scowl: Why is no one jumping on the Chinese skating federation the way they did Skate Canada over the Patrick Chan gross over-scoring? At least Chan wasn't allowed to win the SP the way P/T did. P/T were :eek: . . . unbelievably bad!

None of the errors really affected the performance unlike Chan's multiple falls though. I would still have them in first place but the point difference should be smaller IMO.
 

emma

Record Breaker
Joined
Oct 28, 2004
Here's Pang and Tong's SP in case the link has not been posted. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mhdHmfelQYI

It wasn't great - but I must say that I really love this SP. What i'm skeptical about is the pairs side by side spin at the end; if they can nail that, it will be a nice touch, but it has been sooooooo long since pairs reguarly are in synche with side by side spins that I have found myself just expecting them to be, well, out of unison and unappealing. Still have to watch everyone else except E/L whose SP I also like and see a lot of potential. I liked her dress a lot too. Thanks for all the commentary thus far!
 

zhuzhu

Spectator
Joined
Sep 28, 2009
Yes, they benifit from skating at home. Every team would enjoy the benefit and they are no exception. Anyway, their program needs more refinement,but still looks choregraphy now.
 
Top