- Joined
- Jan 1, 2004
So much I don't understand....
There is a lot that I do not understand about this ladies short program:
First of all, I do not like Sasha Cohen, but yes she should have won based upon technical errors by Michelle. I felt that Michelle's program was more intense and genuienly emotional, so I am surprised that she didn't get more 1sts. But overall, I will admit that Sasha did deserve 1st.
That said....
How can Amber Corwin be put in 5th? How is this possible? First, she should recieve deductions because she is sssslloowwwwwww. So slow! Not only that, but she lacks flair. In terms of her elements, her spirals have no stretch at all and her legs are bent, she triple toe-triple toe is prerotated and therefore a half turn cheated on the take off, her triple lutz has a half turn cheat on the landing, her double axel is wrapped and her spins are nothing to write home about. She does not have any elements that are of good quality. I felt that she should have been below Bebe and AP.
How can Jenny be 3rd and earn 1sts? She has the worst skating quality I have ever seen of a Senior Lady. She walks around the ice and is incredibly choppy and unrefined. Her jump technique is weird and while her 3t-3t is nice usually, her 3z is a flutz with a half turn cheat on the landing and her DA is wrapped. Her spirals aren't that good and her spins are just ok. Her atrocious skating deserves deductions.
How was Angela in 4th? Fourth would have been accurate if she was behind Sasha, Michelle and AP. Alright she skated clean, but those landings! Did you see how they hooked around! People say AP has hooked jumps on ocasion, but those landings were all shakey, off balance and hooked! Yes her layback is great and her camel has nice arch, but the spirals are bad and she is uninspring. She doesn't relate to the crowd.
What I would have had:
1.) Sasha-not as good artistically as Michelle, but cleaner
2.) Michelle-bobble on the DA cost her
3.) AP-she fell, but she was very fast and the other elements were good.
4.) Angela Nikodinov-she was clean, nothing special, but clean. Those twizzly landings though....
5.) Jenny-cheated jumps, choppy skating, etc. She was clean and they do have to reward it.
6.) Amber-slow, cheated jumps, bad technique, slow again, slow, slow but she was clean.
7.) Bebe-I wish I could put her ahead of Jenny and Amber, but all her jumps were not so good. She fell on a wild 3z, shaky DA (from those triples) plus a whipy and small 3f.
There is a lot that I do not understand about this ladies short program:
First of all, I do not like Sasha Cohen, but yes she should have won based upon technical errors by Michelle. I felt that Michelle's program was more intense and genuienly emotional, so I am surprised that she didn't get more 1sts. But overall, I will admit that Sasha did deserve 1st.
That said....
How can Amber Corwin be put in 5th? How is this possible? First, she should recieve deductions because she is sssslloowwwwwww. So slow! Not only that, but she lacks flair. In terms of her elements, her spirals have no stretch at all and her legs are bent, she triple toe-triple toe is prerotated and therefore a half turn cheated on the take off, her triple lutz has a half turn cheat on the landing, her double axel is wrapped and her spins are nothing to write home about. She does not have any elements that are of good quality. I felt that she should have been below Bebe and AP.
How can Jenny be 3rd and earn 1sts? She has the worst skating quality I have ever seen of a Senior Lady. She walks around the ice and is incredibly choppy and unrefined. Her jump technique is weird and while her 3t-3t is nice usually, her 3z is a flutz with a half turn cheat on the landing and her DA is wrapped. Her spirals aren't that good and her spins are just ok. Her atrocious skating deserves deductions.
How was Angela in 4th? Fourth would have been accurate if she was behind Sasha, Michelle and AP. Alright she skated clean, but those landings! Did you see how they hooked around! People say AP has hooked jumps on ocasion, but those landings were all shakey, off balance and hooked! Yes her layback is great and her camel has nice arch, but the spirals are bad and she is uninspring. She doesn't relate to the crowd.
What I would have had:
1.) Sasha-not as good artistically as Michelle, but cleaner
2.) Michelle-bobble on the DA cost her
3.) AP-she fell, but she was very fast and the other elements were good.
4.) Angela Nikodinov-she was clean, nothing special, but clean. Those twizzly landings though....
5.) Jenny-cheated jumps, choppy skating, etc. She was clean and they do have to reward it.
6.) Amber-slow, cheated jumps, bad technique, slow again, slow, slow but she was clean.
7.) Bebe-I wish I could put her ahead of Jenny and Amber, but all her jumps were not so good. She fell on a wild 3z, shaky DA (from those triples) plus a whipy and small 3f.