Y
Yazmeen42skater
Guest
Brief report from the ISI 2003 Annual Conference
Well, Vegas was a blast, and the conference was quite good, so here are a few highlights.
First of all, let me get a little bragging out of the way. I'm now a certified, ISI Bronze Level Judge!!! I passed my exam last Monday. It was open book, but quite comprehensive and challenging. It really tested your knowledge of what to do in certain situations. For example, I had to analyze how to score a skater who competes a Freestyle program at one level and omits a required jump but puts in a higher level jump instead. They not only receive a "0" score for the omitted required move, but also get a "2.0" penalty score under "additional moves" for putting in the other jump which is from a higher level and higher level skills that are not "uncaptured moves" cannot be done in the program. Overall, it was a good experience.
Onto Scott Hamilton. His opening address was frankly not too great. He seemed to be doing it off the cuff, and it mostly consisted of his standard complaint about pro skating being ruined by the money given to eligible skaters along with eligible skaters who don't "leave" the amateur ranks when they should --we don't have the natural "turnover" that should occur every four years. I really think he holds a grudge against Michelle Kwan for staying eligible (and for not signing onto HIS show). He also is now just endorsing the "principles" of the WSF and "has no argument with the ISU" (well, maybe with a few people in the ISU...geez, can you say "backpedaling?"
His presentation with two other speakers on the ISI Special Skater program was much better. You could really see his dedication to working with physically and mentally challenged skaters and he made many good points. It was an interactive session with everyone contributing as to how to get programs like these rolling at your own rink. We want to get a program going at our main rink. We already have one competitive special skater who is an incredible young woman, and this is such a worthwile effort. I'd urge everyone to get involved with this if you can.
I also attended truly good presentations on judging and ISI testing, and how to fairly analyze a skater's skills. There's a lot of emphasis in ISI on making sure that the skating continues to be "fun" for all participants. You want to penalize appropriately, but you also don't want to discourage the skaters. I had the opportunity to talk to Richard Dwyer (the former "Mr. Debonair" of the Ice Follies) who was ISI's Lifetime Achievement winner this year. He is a delight. The man is absolutely GORGEOUS and very personable. He shared some memories of how he loved to skate with his friend, the late Peanuts' cartoonist Charles Schulz, that were delightful. The man is definitely "Mr. Debonair"--he could charm the socks off of anybody!!!
Overall, it was a good conference, and Vegas was a blast. It was hard to go back to work!!
Well, Vegas was a blast, and the conference was quite good, so here are a few highlights.
First of all, let me get a little bragging out of the way. I'm now a certified, ISI Bronze Level Judge!!! I passed my exam last Monday. It was open book, but quite comprehensive and challenging. It really tested your knowledge of what to do in certain situations. For example, I had to analyze how to score a skater who competes a Freestyle program at one level and omits a required jump but puts in a higher level jump instead. They not only receive a "0" score for the omitted required move, but also get a "2.0" penalty score under "additional moves" for putting in the other jump which is from a higher level and higher level skills that are not "uncaptured moves" cannot be done in the program. Overall, it was a good experience.
Onto Scott Hamilton. His opening address was frankly not too great. He seemed to be doing it off the cuff, and it mostly consisted of his standard complaint about pro skating being ruined by the money given to eligible skaters along with eligible skaters who don't "leave" the amateur ranks when they should --we don't have the natural "turnover" that should occur every four years. I really think he holds a grudge against Michelle Kwan for staying eligible (and for not signing onto HIS show). He also is now just endorsing the "principles" of the WSF and "has no argument with the ISU" (well, maybe with a few people in the ISU...geez, can you say "backpedaling?"
His presentation with two other speakers on the ISI Special Skater program was much better. You could really see his dedication to working with physically and mentally challenged skaters and he made many good points. It was an interactive session with everyone contributing as to how to get programs like these rolling at your own rink. We want to get a program going at our main rink. We already have one competitive special skater who is an incredible young woman, and this is such a worthwile effort. I'd urge everyone to get involved with this if you can.
I also attended truly good presentations on judging and ISI testing, and how to fairly analyze a skater's skills. There's a lot of emphasis in ISI on making sure that the skating continues to be "fun" for all participants. You want to penalize appropriately, but you also don't want to discourage the skaters. I had the opportunity to talk to Richard Dwyer (the former "Mr. Debonair" of the Ice Follies) who was ISI's Lifetime Achievement winner this year. He is a delight. The man is absolutely GORGEOUS and very personable. He shared some memories of how he loved to skate with his friend, the late Peanuts' cartoonist Charles Schulz, that were delightful. The man is definitely "Mr. Debonair"--he could charm the socks off of anybody!!!
Overall, it was a good conference, and Vegas was a blast. It was hard to go back to work!!