Why is kanakos pcs so low?
I remember her PCS in the china was low too. 57.03 to 54.96. She is 2 point off for that score.
may they mistook her for Haruka Imai and gave her low PCS ? Imai is 2nd tier Japanese
And she was much, much better here.
She is skating as first skater. This is not advantage for her.
This just proves that judging is crap. So what she is the first one to skate? She skated very, very well.
Anyway, Nicol was lovely but nowhere near Kanako, but I am sure she is going to beat her anyway
Um.
I didn't think that Murakami was all that good. Are you sure you're looking at this objectively? Gosviani also lost to Murakami.
Um.
I didn't think that Murakami was all that good. Are you sure you're looking at this objectively? Gosviani also lost to Murakami.
Murakami landed 7 triples with no glaring errors....beautiful program too.
I think Murakami's triples are downgraded/underotated. Her technical score is too low for 7 triple program.
She was not at her best, but better than Nicol and I am gladly taking back my words.
Kanako was better than in China and yet her PCS are dropping which means she was either overscored in China or underscored here. I am comparing her skate with her previous one. I hate how PCS are used, because we all know she got only 54 here just because she skated first and it was nothing to do with the performance itself. And PCS will increase in the second group, regardless of the actual performances.
113 for what Kanako put on the ice is way to low. I expected something around 120 at least.
Satoko is really skating well so far! Oh well...