Kim at Worlds last year scored 4 points higher in the LP than Suzuki did at her own Nationals and 3 points higher in TES. Sorry but Kim has the huge TES advantage even with 6 triples. I dont believe her base value is any lower, in fact isnt it still higher, and her GOEs on jumps and spins would blow Suzuki's away. Kim internationally ywould have a huge edge on Suzuki on PCS too (even though I wouldnt have it that way). In an international event Suzuki would never get those same scores (and I wish she would as I love her) and if anything Kim would score even higher duplicating the same skate (and her short program score would be way higher than Worlds last year, and much higher than Suzuki doing on the triple toe-triple toe). Kim would have to make multiple errors over the 2 programs to lose to Suzuki no matter how she skates unfortunately.
Kim's LP was perfect. And no doubt a perfect Kim would beat a perfect Akiko handily.
Question is, is Akiko a legitimate OGM? I would say yes if she can skate like she did here.
If she does, Kim will have to go clean. If Kim pops a triple lutz or fall on her triple flip, I don't think she can beat a clean and inspired Akiko. If she makes mistake on the lower BV triple or 2A, yes, she can still win.
Kim's 5 clean triples LP lost to Miki's 5 clean triples LP. It's about momentum as well.
If Akiko can dominate again at 4CC, she will not play second fiddle to Mao and Kim in Sochi.
Top 3 have much higher potential than Akiko. Mao, Akiko, and Carolina are super inconsistent, so it's thrilling to watch. Kim will be on the podium because she doesn't make that many mistakes generally.
Only 5 people worthy of an Olympics medal, Kim, Asada, Kostner, Akiko, and to an extent Wagner. The rest are just not worthy. They might get a medal fair and square if 3 of the top 5 make mistakes, but if top 5 are clean, they should be top 5. No Julia nonsense. No Adelina nonsense.