- Joined
- Mar 26, 2014
well.. sochi is over... they already accomplished what they should accomplish..
The logic then: it's now the time for Korea to accomplish what they should accomplish?
well.. sochi is over... they already accomplished what they should accomplish..
The logic then: it's now the time for Korea to accomplish what they should accomplish?
south korea should put 2 koreans in the technical panel (one who pretends to represent south korea) both in the sp and the lp..and 1 more in the lp..with asking yuri balkov the known cheater to cheat for them this time..that's a total of 4.. after all the south korean skating federation is one of the biggest feds in figure skating.. oh wait..
I'm confused now.....I thought we were against this? Isn't that what the petition was about. I would say if Korea did what they accuse others of than double shame on them. Which is worse really? :think:
Sometimes it's hard to tell when it's sarcasm here ...upon reading it again its quite apparent.:sarcasm:
south korea should put 2 koreans in the technical panel (one who pretends to represent south korea) both in the sp and the lp..and 1 more in the lp..with asking yuri balkov the known cheater to cheat for them this time..that's a total of 4.. after all the south korean skating federation is one of the biggest feds in figure skating.. oh wait..
The talk about Lillehammer is very different.
As I've said before.
Close results that could have gone either way are very good for the sport, they're a favorite topic of fans who like to explore different 'what if?' scenarios. As long as fans trust that the judges are honest.
Had the judging been more transparent, maybe her victory wouldn't be tainted by 'skating while Russian' suspicions. But the big problem is that if a knowledgeable fan watches both performances they're really close. But the judges' marks aren't close. Sotnikova had won before Kim skated. If fans aren't prone to trust that the judges are honest then they're gonna be suspicious and the innocent skater is the one who's going to feel the brunt of the suspicion
I still fail to understand what Sotnikova got to do with all this. All she did is skate the best she could.
Which wasn't as good as her marks were.
Which wasn't as good as her marks were.
That's your opinion and I respect that. Still, I don't understand what Adelina got to do with the scoring? My question is simple really but you are not able to answer that. You keep talking about the judges.
The question is: Can the fans trust the judges are doing an honest job and not trying to influence the competition one way or another?
Had the results in Sochi been more transparent then maybe there wouldn't be so much negative feeling toward Sotnikova
That's stupid though isn't it? I mean what does Sotnikova got to do with the scoring?
You can't though. There are many Fed's under speed skating because they are small or don't have enough funds to have their own FS Fed.
I understand what your saying but having figure skating governed by a speed skater hasn't really helped the sport in the last decade.
According to you.
Hey, this is the link I posted, not that: http://fskating.com/2014/04/american-top-skating-official-reacts-on-cinquantas-proposals.htmlSent by Meioma... http://www.usatoday.com/story/sports...dging/8566193/