I expected it to be honest. They were held back on PCS big time.
I honestly thought that I/Z were better than S/K in the short. The judges didn't want to see it that way I guess.
Like I thought be4 no front-runner in the skiz battle
Anyone can be 3rd in the FD
Just skating skills! Very close. Its a no-decision. They didn't want to make a decision yet.
Imo the Fed wrote both off as unreliableSo Ruslena is the one that the Fed does not support out of my favourites. Oh well... On a positive, I think Ruslan is improving with every year
I/Z were really slow and heavy on the ice .
S/K looked very polished and even Victoria sold it good, but again the short is better than their free.
on the contrary, i thought S/K were better than I/Z and S/B in the short.... sharp and polished.
Imo the Fed wrote both off as unreliable
& I can't blame them tbh
If we look at the big picture what's the prize in being country's #3:confused2:
Imo the Fed wrote both off as unreliable
& I can't blame them tbh
If we look at the big picture what's the prize in being country's #3:confused2:
Don't get me wrong I agree with you but in regards to #3 I doubt the Fed cares that muchThe thing is top two were set in stone even before the competition. RN = a summary of the Grand prix events. Placement will reflect 100% the results on the GP irrespective of the actual skating. To be more precise, I don't think B/S were 4 points better than S/B, but B/S were spectacular on the GP (and got on GPF were they beat two American teams). S/B were solid on the GP but only got a bronze, so a second place here, because the rest of the pack did not medal. Next: S/K and I/Z were pretty much similar in terms on results, so no need to differentiate one of the other that much - it was a matter of luck who got third or fourth. But since I/Z are more prone to mistakes and less reliable in the last period of time, the judges marked them slightly lower.
So I repeat again, this is not an actual competition, unless someone has a big mistake/meltdown and shake things up. The results are predetermined.
Interpretation and Performance also. S/K were much more reserved and tentative to not miss the elements. I/Z gave it 110% because they could not afford to be conservatively clean. It didn't matter anyway in the end.
Oh, I agree they are unrealiable. The GP performances were kind of freaky. :hopelessness: But scoring base on consistency is freaky too.
Wow, I can't believe there were 3 teams worse than STAVITSKAYA/BAGIN...
Its so close. Its basically a tie and one too long lift deduction could change everything in the FD.