KEEP YOUR FILTHY PAWS OFF MY MAN!!! :ddevil:
Don't make me get in my car and drive up there!!! It's only five hours away, and I have a lead foot!
KEEP YOUR FILTHY PAWS OFF MY MAN!!! :ddevil:
Don't make me get in my car and drive up there!!! It's only five hours away, and I have a lead foot!
To someone smarter than me: can someone tell me where the stumbles from WeaPo SD was counted? Their TES is higher that G/P, all levels 4, all positive GOE. Did it lower PCS a little? I'm really curious what judges did to reflect they had these stumbles, I;d like to know in what area they can score higher if they skate flawlessly this program.
Just bumped into gerry aka PP. I hope he shaves his stache tomorrow. Nice looking boy.
Lucky you! I think he's quite cute, especially shaven. Doesn't he always keep a tiny stache for the tango?
Their stumbles weren't really counted. Their no-touch midline should have been downgraded because of Andrew's twizzle mistake at the end. I know this is Nationals, but it's ludicrous that still counted as a Level 4.
To someone smarter than me: can someone tell me where the stumbles from WeaPo SD was counted? Their TES is higher that G/P, all levels 4, all positive GOE. Did it lower PCS a little? I'm really curious what judges did to reflect they had these stumbles, I;d like to know in what area they can score higher if they skate flawlessly this program.
Their stumbles weren't really counted. Their no-touch midline should have been downgraded because of Andrew's twizzle mistake at the end. I know this is Nationals, but it's ludicrous that still counted as a Level 4.
This is the one that's problematic. Their first stumble wasn't on an element, so isn't reflected in the technical score. The twizzle at the end of the step sequence, however, to my mind is still clearly part of that sequence.
Ok, but does that mean a team can stumble through program as long as it's not technical element? Shouldn't that be somehow reflected in PCS then? (and maybe it was...)