- Joined
- Apr 10, 2016
interesting but this does not tell the tale about the quality of the skating, edge etc. Still interesting.
Yes it's true, and I expected also remarks like this. These are just some quantitative aspects that to me could matter in the evaluation of SS and TR, though.
In fact, those counts and the resulting numbers have been useful to me to observe and to understand better what actually those skaters are doing with their feet besides the elements, and also their/ their teams different strategies in the "building" of the programs, depending also by the skaters skills. You can see also better this aspect if you look at the distribution of one foot skating in the different sections of the programs (and in doing so I realised that some ChSqs are a joke, or at least have a really simplistic choreography...).
In any case, I hope that the video and its contents will be useful to other people who want to take in consideration these data to reflect a bit about what these skaters do on the ice and that should / could be reflected at least in part in the PCs scores.
An other thing I wanted to remark with the data used in the video is that SS and TR by are not just artistic components like IN, PE and in part CO - like some people still tend to claim (I read often "PCS are for the artistic marks") - and, at some extent, they can be also "countable" and evaluable in a more objective way, if one want to do it.