- Joined
- Aug 25, 2017
Why is this thread suddenly so petty and why is it never about the Russian ladies?? There's so many quality skaters to talk about and instead we're arguing the semantics of the word "multiple"??!!
Why is this thread suddenly so petty and why is it never about the Russian ladies?? There's so many quality skaters to talk about and instead we're arguing the semantics of the word "multiple"??!!
Exactly.
Maybe we can even continue the closed thread about can anyone beat a clean Zagitova right here?
It depends on the new rules. If they take out the backloading bonus a clean Medvedeva could beat her since she was close to doing so this season, perhaps even a super clean Osmond considering the latest scores she got. But then again, Alina still has the most difficult combo on her part and she should get high GOEs, so in my opinion she's still going to be the one to beat bar any drastic changes.
Sofia Dzepka's SP from today.
Her skating skills really are incredible. And not just for her age(8).
Well, yes, that may be the case for you and others who are more invested in figure skating, but as I have many casual viewers in my family who know absolutely nothing about it, I can tell you that they mostly watch out for the presence of a skater on the ice and whether they fall or not. So seeing a skater who had no visible mistakes (e.g. step-outs, falls...) get severe point deductions just because they pre-rotated would greatly confuse them. And not only them but many, many more spectators. I‘m not saying that just because of the people in front of the TV, the rules should be lax or something like this, but we should definitely take into consideration that figure skating - like any sport - is kept alive not only by the athletes and the coaches but also the people who watch it, buy the tickets for competitions and shows etc.
Besides, there‘s also the fact that the current elite athletes mostly pre-rotate. Kaetlyn, Medvedeva, Zagitova, Miyahara and so on, so on. So what if Tuktamysheva‘s jumps look better? She‘s not been to Worlds, Olympics or anything this year....
And I definitely enjoy watching Zagitova jump. There’s nothing laboured as far as I can see. And Kaetlyn’s jumps are huge, even though she pre-rotates. That‘s just my opinion, though.
I don't question that you find Tuktamysheva's jumps better to watch than Zagitova's or Medvedeva's. But I DO question that the reason is the pre-rotation! For a very obvious example, let's take:
Alexandra Trusova's SP 3Lutz
Elizaveta Berestovskaya's SP 3Lutz
Here, you'll note that Trusova pre-rotates by a huge amount(180 degrees). On the other hand, Berestovskaya has just about the most perfect Lutz technique I've ever seen out of a Russian lady. She doesn't pre-rotate in the slightest, not the tiniest bit(as close to 0 degrees of pre-rotation I've seen anyone get). But Trusova's jump is massive, while Berestovskaya's is tiny. In a situation like this, do you still think that Berestovskaya's perfectly non- pre-rotated Lutz is better to watch? Or is the reason behind Tuktamysheva's Lutz being better to watch something completely different altogether? Notable that Berestovskaya's technique is also better than Tuktamysheva's on her Lutz.
if isu raises the age from 15 to 16 then expect Trusova to become the first lady ever to win 3 junior world titles
Yeah, most likely they wouldn't. But it can change after next season. I mean if the next season will pass under the banner of Trusova/Scherbakova quads - isu officials can get scared of too drastic changes in power balance in next senior season and can decide to ban them for a year - however as pitiful as it sounds. Or maybe I am just too paranoid and rules changes can occur only once each 2 years? Was there isu congress last year?I don't think they would do it.
Basically, doing such change right now would mean russian girls on all podiums in juniors for the next 2 years, and nearly 0 chance for everybody else. This also means less opportunities for the juniors from other countries to build up reputation and get senior GP spots and so on. And ofc would keep other juniors from turning senior too, so dunno. It could backfire.
I don't think ISU cares about Russian ladies sweeping JW podium - it happened twice in last five years. The only reason would be to prevent a revolution in senior circuit. Postponing junior ladies means: 1. they will have to proof that their jumping abiblity is not only a prepuberty benefit; 2. senior ladies will have one more year to learn more difficult jumps (quads, 3A, combinations) to compete with teens.Basically, doing such change right now would mean russian girls on all podiums in juniors for the next 2 years, and nearly 0 chance for everybody else.
I don't think ISU cares about Russian ladies sweeping JW podium - it happened twice in last five years. The only reason would be to prevent a revolution in senior circuit. Postponing junior ladies means: 1. they will have to proof that their jumping abiblity is not only a prepuberty benefit; 2. senior ladies will have one more year to learn more difficult jumps (quads, 3A, combinations) to compete with teens.
this.Yeah, most likely they wouldn't. But it can change after next season. I mean if the next season will pass under the banner of Trusova/Scherbakova quads - isu officials can get scared of too drastic changes in power balance in next senior season and can decide to ban them for a year - however as pitiful as it sounds. Or maybe I am just too paranoid and rules changes can occur only once each 2 years? Was there isu congress last year?
I don't think ISU cares about Russian ladies sweeping JW podium - it happened twice in last five years. The only reason would be to prevent a revolution in senior circuit. Postponing junior ladies means: 1. they will have to proof that their jumping abiblity is not only a prepuberty benefit; 2. senior ladies will have one more year to learn more difficult jumps (quads, 3A, combinations) to compete with teens.
I don't think they would do it.
Basically, doing such change right now would mean russian girls on all podiums in juniors for the next 2 years, and nearly 0 chance for everybody else. This also means less opportunities for the juniors from other countries to build up reputation and get senior GP spots and so on. And ofc would keep other juniors from turning senior too, so dunno. It could backfire.
Last news
Medvedeva stops cooperation with Eteri