Its all in the paperwork, as she had not filed her retirement paperwork she was still considered an active athlete and in the 'testing queue' according to some articles she missed 3 tests; if that's true and she was going to retire and that's why she was taking the substance than after the first test request she should have sought the Fed to get whatever documentation they needed to have her removed from being an active athlete and tested.Oh no, how awful! I'm so sorry to hear that. Pity there's no way to appeal... a 10-year sentence for using medication once she had retired is very harsh.
She didn't officially retire until July 2020. Prior to this, she was still an active athlete and obligated not to miss 3 tests [1st offense], fail the 4th one [2nd offense] and most certainly not "forge" a document [3rd offense]. She could have received a lesser ban if she had just slammed the door in RUSADA face when they caught her at home on the 4th attempt and filed the appropriate paperwork then but no.....Oh no, how awful! I'm so sorry to hear that. Pity there's no way to appeal... a 10-year sentence for using medication once she had retired is very harsh.
A very sad situation... I'm very sorry for her but if this is really what happened she truly should have seek advice from her coach or her federation at the first offense. Doesn't the federation get notified when an athlete miss a test?She didn't officially retire until July 2020. Prior to this, she was still an active athlete and obligated not to miss 3 tests [1st offense], fail the 4th one [2nd offense] and most certainly not "forge" a document [3rd offense]. She could have received a lesser ban if she had just slammed the door in RUSADA face when they caught her at home on the 4th attempt and filed the appropriate paperwork then but no.....
I agree. Why wasn't she warned that she could still be tested. She's retiring right? How can this effect her? Will they strip her of her medals?A very sad situation... I'm very sorry for her but if this is really what happened she truly should have seek advice from her coach or her federation at the first offense. Doesn't the federation get notified when an athlete miss a test?
I don't think that they will strip her of her medals because the failure on the doping test happened recently... however I read that she could be prevented from coaching and choreographing for the next 10 years, which is what she was studying at university in order to become a coach in the future. If they confirm the sanction, this is indeed a harsh punishment. Hope that someone who reads Russian can provide more informations.I agree. Why wasn't she warned that she could still be tested. She's retiring right? How can this effect her? Will they strip her of her medals?
I wonder if this will keep her from being allowed to coach, if that's what she was hoping to do. Such a shame, but Russia needs a patsy to show how tough they are on 'dopers'. Why not a skater who retired to show how hard they come down on dopers?
2 thoughts on it:Yeah, I'm not sure what the implications are here. Since coaches aren't tested for PEDs, I don't know why that would preclude her from participating in the sport as a non-athlete.
No. She was not on the main or reserve team and Vaitsekhovskaya said on her blog that Maria was receiving no money. She was probably was still on the fence about retiring.But wasn't she receiving some salary from RusFed ? I suppose this might be the reason why she was delaying her "official" retirement.
First time quoting on the new forum; hope this quotes right.She didn't officially retire until July 2020. Prior to this, she was still an active athlete and obligated not to miss 3 tests [1st offense], fail the 4th one [2nd offense] and most certainly not "forge" a document [3rd offense]. She could have received a lesser ban if she had just slammed the door in RUSADA face when they caught her at home on the 4th attempt and filed the appropriate paperwork then but no.....
First time quoting on the new forum; hope this quotes right.
Anyway, yes, I know it was her fault for not submitting the right paperwork at the right time. But that's my point. She wasn't prepping for a competition or even training in any way whatsoever. She's apparently moved on with her life. The harm to the sport is exactly 0%--it's not like she's competing and doping for a competitive edge. So to find yourself with a 10-year suspension like this is really a pity. It seems like more of a symbolic gesture than anything else from the fed.
First time quoting on the new forum; hope this quotes right.
So to find yourself with a 10-year suspension like this is really a pity. It seems like more of a symbolic gesture than anything else from the fed.
this is really unfortunate. the responsibility of not turning in retirement forms does fall on Masha, but shouldn't the clinic also face some sort of punishment for not having a license? that was not her fault.According to TASS, Maria Sotskova missed three doping tests during the year, and furosemide was found in one of her samples. Furosemide is a strong diuretic ('water pill') that may cause dehydration. Water pills are often taken as a weight-loss solution. In 2001, Alina Kabaeva received a one-year disqualification for the use of furosemide. She faces a longer suspension because the clinic that issued a medical certificate to explain the use of the water pill does not have a license.
I don't know if the article explains this, but doesn't the clinic have the license in general or wasn't the medical certificate valid because Maria didnìt have a TUE for that substance? Thank you!According to TASS, Maria Sotskova missed three doping tests during the year, and furosemide was found in one of her samples. Furosemide is a strong diuretic ('water pill') that may cause dehydration. Water pills are often taken as a weight-loss solution. In 2001, Alina Kabaeva received a one-year disqualification for the use of furosemide. She faces a longer suspension because the clinic that issued a medical certificate to explain the use of the water pill does not have a license.