I definitely agree with Matt.CDMM1991 said:My pick would be Matt Savoie. He has all the makings of a US National, or even World Champion, but they're never all there at the right time. I'm sure he'll achieve tons of success in his other pursuits in life though.
anything_for_skating said:Irina won on Euros 7 times and you should know that
anything_for_skating said:Irina won on Euros 7 times and you should know that
But she never won thing that she deserves more than anyone-OGM
Kasey said:I "Should" know that? NOT being an Irina fan? I suppose then, that you "should" know the medal history of every skater that you don't care so much for and don't follow then either, yes? I was at least in the right "ballpark" with it. And had she deserved the OGM "more than anyone", perhaps she would have put two performances together that were good enough to win. What makes someone more "deserving" of any medal other than their performances at THAT event? Personal hardship, so sorry, does not count when it comes to competition.
Red Dog said:it's probably that old rehashed argument that she should have won the short program over MK. Yawn.
anything_for_skating said:It's not about being Irina's fan or not. It's about being a SKATING fan. It's an ISU record that she made.
She DESERVES it. I am sick of explaining why does she in every thread. I think before the Olys, it was exactly you who asked the same thing in one thread. And I did answer........(boy, I did)
slutskayafan21 said:To be honest I think the short and long between MK and IS in 2002 both could have gone either way. My feeling was always that if IS had won the short, and MK been second in the short, and all skaters skated the same way in the long, MK would have placed 2nd in the long, and IS 3rd, to avoid controversy and make sure Hughes won overall. So losing the short actually gave Irina the silver instead of the bronze probably.
Also attyfan I believe it was, or maybe somebody else, made a good point that Michelle probably would have been on fire in the long if she was 2nd in the short, since she showed at the 00 and 01 Worlds she likes coming from behind, and being the hunted, on the heels of her rivals.
anything_for_skating said:It's not about being Irina's fan or not. It's about being a SKATING fan. It's an ISU record that she made.
She DESERVES it. I am sick of explaining why does she in every thread. I think before the Olys, it was exactly you who asked the same thing in one thread. And I did answer........(boy, I did)
Red Dog said:it's probably that old rehashed argument that she should have won the short program over MK. Yawn.
antmanb said:No body DESERVES anything as of right. If they work hard for it and pull off the two performances at the right time then they win it. If they don't then they didn't deserve it, the more deserving person is the one who does pull off the two programs. In Torino that was Arakawa who's two performances were better than Irina. End of story.
Ant
Kwanford Wife said:Now you know its pointless to argue who deserves what with skating fans... only our favorites deserve to win because we love them sooo much... what they put out on the ice during a specific competiton is irrelevant...
Red Dog said:" ... perhaps, perhaps. But the Olympics are always a different ballgame. In this year's Olympics Irina was 2nd going into the free. Since she usually is first you'd think that would give her some fire. But no, she caved in under the pressure. So you never know. I also think that if Cohen was 2nd she still would have skated the same way (she just seemed to be off that night for whatever reason). For Arakawa, didn't really matter I don't think.