Another edge question

[Joesitz (RIP)]

I guess the crib sheet the caller has will have the information down as to whether a combination is expected in the first instance. IF at the end of the performance only two combinations have been executed then the second triple that would have been in violation of the Zayak rule will be given the benefit of the doubt and the "+COMBO" assigned to it.

Yeah. I was trying to keep the Caller out of this.

_____________________________________________________________

The 0.8 for a series is not a point value that is added - it is literally a multiplyer to the jump so that it devalues the base marks of the two jumps. e.g. a double axel/half loop/triple salchow is (3.3 + 4.5) x 0.8 = 6.25 as opposed to the 7.8 points the twp jumps would have in isolation or if the sequence was marked the same as a combination. Ant

I did use the term 'factor' which in math and in figures was a multiplier.

Joe

 

[antmanb]

Yeah. I was trying to keep the Caller out of this.

Which would be the first change i would make to CoP!!!

_____________________________________________________________

I did use the term 'factor' which in math and in figures was a multiplier.

Joe

Sorry i misinterpreted your comment about the series being more difficult to mean that you thought the score went up from a combo!

Ant