I think I'm about to drive my daughter's coach over the edge talking all this out, so here I am to hash it out some more. We decided not to hire a choreographer this season since we only have a connection to one and we had a bit of an issue last season. We were all pretty happy with the program her coach created, but after completing the first two IJS competitions of the season, I'm noticing that many of her competitors' programs are just at a different level.
I went through the protocols from last competition and out of 10 skaters in her group, only four skaters had 3 elements in the last half of the program. My daughter was one. Her 2F is in the last second of the program. She lands her 2Lz pretty well in practice, but in the program it's at the 1:30 mark and just 8 seconds after her combo spin. It's a little much for her and something I think more thoughtful choreography and layout could really help fix.
I have an e-mail out to a choreographer I found on Google (yes, this is the level of desperation I'm experiencing), but I don't know if we'll be able to connect with him (he's no longer in the area full time) and since there's no Amazon for choreographers, I'm concerned that we just won't be able to find someone. But maybe I shouldn't be stressing... maybe the program isn't really that important in the grand scheme. I just want to give her equal footing.
So... How much weight is placed on linking steps, transitions, etc? Especially at this level where there are only 3 components judged (performance, skating skills, interpretation). Does having fewer components to judge make it harder to find a category in which you impress a judge? Or easier? Can you get great component scores with a subpar program? I mean, I'm sure you can... but just how much better do you need to be to compensate for a program that lacks all the things component scores are built upon? How much does the basic layout of the program impact the quality of the program?
I went through the protocols from last competition and out of 10 skaters in her group, only four skaters had 3 elements in the last half of the program. My daughter was one. Her 2F is in the last second of the program. She lands her 2Lz pretty well in practice, but in the program it's at the 1:30 mark and just 8 seconds after her combo spin. It's a little much for her and something I think more thoughtful choreography and layout could really help fix.
I have an e-mail out to a choreographer I found on Google (yes, this is the level of desperation I'm experiencing), but I don't know if we'll be able to connect with him (he's no longer in the area full time) and since there's no Amazon for choreographers, I'm concerned that we just won't be able to find someone. But maybe I shouldn't be stressing... maybe the program isn't really that important in the grand scheme. I just want to give her equal footing.
So... How much weight is placed on linking steps, transitions, etc? Especially at this level where there are only 3 components judged (performance, skating skills, interpretation). Does having fewer components to judge make it harder to find a category in which you impress a judge? Or easier? Can you get great component scores with a subpar program? I mean, I'm sure you can... but just how much better do you need to be to compensate for a program that lacks all the things component scores are built upon? How much does the basic layout of the program impact the quality of the program?