The combination of a beautiful triple lutz and underrotated triple loop is a poorly done combination. Period.
You obviously haven't seen some of those "underrotated" 3-3's..
The combination of a beautiful triple lutz and underrotated triple loop is a poorly done combination. Period.
You obviously haven't seen some of those "underrotated" 3-3's..
The combination of a beautiful triple lutz and underrotated triple loop is a poorly done combination. Period.
According to...you? Some of us definitely felt the freedom and expression from her performance despite the jump mistakes and even think it was the best she has presented the program this season. And judging from her PCS, the judges probably did as well.It's too bad that the qualities you've written about didn't define Joannie's performance (IMO). The choreography she was given might have been aiming for those things, but the way she emotes and moves her body does not reflect it very well. I think her program from last year was a much better fit.
In comparison to what, a perfectly executed 3Lutz/3Loop? Sure.
But NOT in comparison to a 3Lutz(with a hard landing)/2Toe.
Think about what you're actually saying. If Miki's combination was "poorly" done, then Joannie's was even more poor.
In comparison to what, a perfectly executed 3Lutz/3Loop? Sure.
But NOT in comparison to a 3Lutz(with a hard landing)/2Toe.
Think about what you're actually saying. If Miki's combination was "poorly" done, then Joannie's was even more poor.
According to...you? Some of us definitely felt the freedom and expression from her performance despite the jump mistakes and even think it was the best she has presented the program this season. And judging from her PCS, the judges probably did as well.
According to...you?
Joannie didn't have big combos in competition like Miki and Mao, because she spent a huge amount of time in her developing years learning the proper techniques. She now fully rotates and cleanly takes off on loops instead of skidding off on takeoff. She spent 2 years fixing her flutzes. Had she decided to ignore her flutzs or cheated jumps and rushed to add 3-3 in her arsenal, she would have had a big 3-3 in competitions, but paid in downgrades.
So the judging system is fair in the sense that it rewards skaters who invested their energy and effort to perfect the right ways, rather than those who rush to pick up big tricks. It encourages the developing skaters to do it right way, or else you pay for it later in your skating career.
So the judging system is fair in the sense that it rewards skaters who invested their energy and effort to perfect the right ways, rather than those who rush to pick up big tricks. It encourages the developing skaters to do it right way, or else you pay for it later in your skating career.
ITA. I can't remember how many times I was at competitions when I was younger and would watch the lower levels and ten year old girls were already cheating all their double jumps. I think the new system really emphasizes proper techinique.
I see that you didn't get the memo that Blades of Passion is the omniscient voice in all that is figure skating, either. According to him/her, all of our impressions and opinions are wrong.
I would rather see more combinations like Joannie's, than see consistently underrotated triple-triple combos. Sorry, jmo. You are welcome to disagree.
Joannie didn't have big combos in competition like Miki and Mao, because she spent a huge amount of time in her developing years learning the proper techniques. She now fully rotates and cleanly takes off on loops instead of skidding off on takeoff. She spent 2 years fixing her flutzes. Had she decided to ignore her flutzs or cheated jumps and rushed to add 3-3 in her arsenal, she would have had a big 3-3 in competitions, but paid in downgrades.
The point is that skaters know what they risk when they are attempting a 3-3. Unfortunately under the current rules an underrotated 3-3 is worth less than a 3-2 but everybody knows and it's up to them what they want to choose.
If those underrotated triple-triples were causing poor landings your argument would make sense. But Miki's landings weren't bad? Her Lutz was absolutely better than Joannie's and you have yet to acknowledge that point.
When Joannie doubled her Loop in the LP were you happy? Was that better to you than Miki's huge 3Loop which was 1/4 turn short?
Oh please, you're simply being a fanboy(girl). I'm not going to feel sorry for trying to judge objectively instead of simply holding up the skater from my country.
If Joannie was the one in 4th place because these injustices in the scoring system you would be upset.
Fail. I'm a US citizen, born and raised. I'm a fan of many skaters from all nations around the world. I am being objective in my comments. It was bad judgment on the part of Mao and her coach to attempt a 3Lutz, her weakest jump, in the SP. The judges have time and time again given Asada an "e" or a "!" on her faulty Lutz, but Team Asada made the choice to attempt it anyway and Mao doubted her technique and doubled it. Also, Mao and Tatiana had to know that attempting two 3Axels in the LP was a very risky move. That's Team Mao's fault, not the judges. If she can't manage the technique and content properly under pressure, she shouldn't be attempting it. Same with Miki Ando. Time and time again, she has been downgraded for her under-rotated 3loop attempts in competition, but Team Ando made the decision to attempt them anyway, faulty technique and all. It's not the judges' fault that correct technique was not taught and that smart jump layouts were not planned.
Overall i think this year ladies free skate is higher in quality than previous year. All the top 12 ladies after the SP skate it very well (except Kostner meltdown) =(. The number of falls from the top 12 ladies is far less than last year and most important of all, no tumble from the american ladies.
I can't wait for the Olympics even thou it's 10 months away.
i am japanese and i live in japan, and i can telll you from my experince that mao has been critized very bluntly and very impertinently. Sadly many of the reporters in japan think mao did not give 100%. I'm not going to rebel against this because then more and more news and different views of mao will surface. -_-./