Hi, OwenEvans. I can't agree with your conclusion that the ISU is "stupid" for allowing eligible skaters to make money while at the same time keeping the skaters under the thumb of the ISU in terms of Olympic eligibility. IMO this was brilliancy on the part of Cinquanta and his ISU cronies. In one stroke they killed off professional skating and took control of the whole shebang.
Hi Mathman, I didn't mean the ISU was "stupid" for above, I just meant "stupid" for many and varied reasons. But your reasoning is correct I think and that is why there is no "amateur" status anymore, just "eligible". Except in sanctioned events, (and how many pro-ams have there been lately??), pros can't step on the ice with eligibles, just like always, so what is the difference, except semantics?. A skater still has to turn professional to be able to have total control over their career. This is the same with all of the Olympic sports that haven't openly embraced participation by professional athletes such as tennis and basketball. Athletics was the purest of pure amateur sports, but now they have the Golden League, gymnastics has its Grand Prix events and these are very recent changes to those sports, effectively making pros redundant and keeping the talent within the sport for longer and what is even more important, effectively under the control of the governing bodies.
Albright, Heiss, Djikstra, Schuba and even Flemming all were in a different era. Shows were the thing to do after the OGM
Joe, then what about Kristi? Why didn't she stay eligible? Of course, it is entirely possible no-one wanted to keep practicing/performing to eligible standards but methinks it really is a combination of above and also "I've got the OGM, now I can make some $$$". I think it especially telling that Kristi did not reapply for eligibility to come back for 94 when she was probably skating better than 92 and at the very least would certainly have been a top contender, Can anyone tell me if Yags has just "retired" from eligible skating or has he officially gone professional? If it is the latter, then why? Is it because if he is eligible, he can't make $$$ as and when he would like, he still has to bow to the Russian Federation? If that is so, then it seems like the old "amateur" standards have just been dressed in new clothes in the current "eligble" world.
As for Kat Witt, her popularity after 1984 was such that she could have signed a lucrative ice contract and defected. She herself said that she skated for the titles and medals and her record speaks for itself.
Soogar, you make defecting from your country sound like it's as easy as going to the movies. Kat was a STAR in the GDR - she would have wanted for nothing. I'm sure she didn't return home after an Olympics or Worlds to be treated with indifference! There was no reason to leave as she was provided everything and certainly would have enjoyed a lifestyle most of her countrymen could only dream of. And also, put yourself into her shoes if that were to be the case - could you leave your homeland, your family, your everything so easily? I think Martina Navratilova explained the downside of defecting quite eloquently in her autobiography as did Jaroslav Drobny (another Czech tennis star, of the 40s and 50s who defected in the late 40s) in his.
Sorry everyone, I'm raving again. Please understand I am not arguing - just discussing!
Hi Mathman, I didn't mean the ISU was "stupid" for above, I just meant "stupid" for many and varied reasons. But your reasoning is correct I think and that is why there is no "amateur" status anymore, just "eligible". Except in sanctioned events, (and how many pro-ams have there been lately??), pros can't step on the ice with eligibles, just like always, so what is the difference, except semantics?. A skater still has to turn professional to be able to have total control over their career. This is the same with all of the Olympic sports that haven't openly embraced participation by professional athletes such as tennis and basketball. Athletics was the purest of pure amateur sports, but now they have the Golden League, gymnastics has its Grand Prix events and these are very recent changes to those sports, effectively making pros redundant and keeping the talent within the sport for longer and what is even more important, effectively under the control of the governing bodies.
Albright, Heiss, Djikstra, Schuba and even Flemming all were in a different era. Shows were the thing to do after the OGM
Joe, then what about Kristi? Why didn't she stay eligible? Of course, it is entirely possible no-one wanted to keep practicing/performing to eligible standards but methinks it really is a combination of above and also "I've got the OGM, now I can make some $$$". I think it especially telling that Kristi did not reapply for eligibility to come back for 94 when she was probably skating better than 92 and at the very least would certainly have been a top contender, Can anyone tell me if Yags has just "retired" from eligible skating or has he officially gone professional? If it is the latter, then why? Is it because if he is eligible, he can't make $$$ as and when he would like, he still has to bow to the Russian Federation? If that is so, then it seems like the old "amateur" standards have just been dressed in new clothes in the current "eligble" world.
As for Kat Witt, her popularity after 1984 was such that she could have signed a lucrative ice contract and defected. She herself said that she skated for the titles and medals and her record speaks for itself.
Soogar, you make defecting from your country sound like it's as easy as going to the movies. Kat was a STAR in the GDR - she would have wanted for nothing. I'm sure she didn't return home after an Olympics or Worlds to be treated with indifference! There was no reason to leave as she was provided everything and certainly would have enjoyed a lifestyle most of her countrymen could only dream of. And also, put yourself into her shoes if that were to be the case - could you leave your homeland, your family, your everything so easily? I think Martina Navratilova explained the downside of defecting quite eloquently in her autobiography as did Jaroslav Drobny (another Czech tennis star, of the 40s and 50s who defected in the late 40s) in his.
Sorry everyone, I'm raving again. Please understand I am not arguing - just discussing!