- Joined
- Feb 17, 2010
What do you think about this theory that the user (Andy) from ISU forum came up with--under COP, unlike 6.0 system, 2 judges are enough to severely impact the outcomes of any event?
Five judges scored Adelina over 151, and all of those within a range of about 5 points. There were not two judges who scored her unusually high.
You friend Andy used an example: SS: 7,7,7,7,7,7,7,9,9
That is not what happened here. Adelina's lowest SS was 8.5 and she had 6 9.0+. She got all 9.0+ on PE, eight 9.0+ on CH and IN. The judges absolutely loved the program. To argue that two judges caused the result here is, frankly, stupid and ignores anything gleaned from a basic review of the protocols.
Please don't take my word for it: http://www.isuresults.com/results/owg2014/owg14_Ladies_FS_Scores.pdf
I don't understand how we are arguing whether two judges tilted this event when Adelina's third highest score was higher than all of Yuna's.