There's a lack of transparency here that's upsetting. They need to say exactly what are the criteria for getting on the team, and stick with it.
Give a point value for a medal in the GPF of that year, or even the Grand Prix regular competition. OK, so Adam has two silver medals? He already has, say four points. Ross has 0? He has no points. Then give points for medals in the nationals. Whoever has the most points wins, with Nationals as the tie breaker, say. Of course, that would cause Jason to probably displace Vincent, and putting Jason on the team was never in the discussion for whatever reason.
Or go by scores. The people with the highest short and long program scores of the season are on, because they're needed for the team.That would cover a potential medalist having a bad day, slight injury or cold, or even having to miss the competition.
A case could be made that Ross Miner has not been a great skater over the years, but I feel bad for him. It's clear that the backroom deals etc. are alive and well.
There's a lack of transparency here that's upsetting. They need to say exactly what are the criteria for getting on the team, and stick with it.
Give a point value for a medal in the GPF of that year, or even the Grand Prix regular competition. OK, so Adam has two silver medals? He already has, say four points. Ross has 0? He has no points. Then give points for medals in the nationals. Whoever has the most points wins, with Nationals as the tie breaker, say. Of course, that would cause Jason to probably displace Vincent, and putting Jason on the team was never in the discussion for whatever reason.
Or go by scores. The people with the highest short and long program scores of the season are on, because they're needed for the team.That would cover a potential medalist having a bad day, slight injury or cold, or even having to miss the competition.
A case could be made that Ross Miner has not been a great skater over the years, but I feel bad for him. It's clear that the backroom deals etc. are alive and well.
I would like to see a system where Nationals placement was the default and any change would face a significant burden of proof. That way if, for instance, Nathan was under the weather and only got 4th at Nationals, he could still be selected based on his dominant season.
But Chou edging Miner at some minor event in the fall would not meet the threshold.
It's going to add to people not taking the sport seriously. Your results don't matter, just if some random unknown people in a committee like you
You don't even know why Ross was left off the team. Someone on the committee might not like his personality, or his 5 o'clock shadow, or his costume. The decision is not even transparent
It is demoralizing for Mitchell...it's going to hurt the sport if coaches that succeed in getting their skaters to nail their jumps and get onto the podium start quitting due to perceived favoritism for the Olympics. Ross' quad and axel looked solid.
Wouldn’t a better comparison be Vincent to Polina?
If I'm understanding this correctly, the selection committee decision was already decided to kick off -someone- who finished on the podium, so Adam could be on the Olympic team.
The 11-1 vote was for Ross to be booted off instead of Vincent. 11 to 1, can you imagine that? That's near unanimous for one GP in Russia being more important than our own Nationals.
I would like to see a system where Nationals placement was the default and any change would face a significant burden of proof. That way if, for instance, Nathan was under the weather and only got 4th at Nationals, he could still be selected based on his dominant season.
But Chou edging Miner at some minor event in the fall would not meet the threshold.
If I'm understanding this correctly, the selection committee decision was already decided to kick off -someone- who finished on the podium, so Adam could be on the Olympic team.
The 11-1 vote was for Ross to be booted off instead of Vincent. 11 to 1, can you imagine that? That's near unanimous for one GP in Russia being more important than our own Nationals.
Looking at the scores on paper is meaningless. Domestically Zhou's PCS have been very inflated and internationally his scores were inflated by underrotated quads that did not get called. At Finlandia Trophy, the Quad Sal and Quad Toe were both cheated, but not called. That is a BIG point boost he gets as a result, not just on the technical mark but also on the overall perception of the judges for the PCS, thinking he is capable of doing 4 Quads. His technique on the Quad Toe is especially horrendous, he's never even close on that jump. Vincent would have only finished that competition in 4th place rather than 2nd if he had been called correctly.
That LP of Zhou's at Finlandia, where he supposedly did 4 Quads, was something that gave him a lot of buzz and yet in actuality he only did 1 clean Quad in the whole competition - the Flip in the LP. In the SP he messed up the Lutz landing and underrotated the Flip, in the LP he again messed up the Lutz, and underrotated both the Sal and the Toe.
At Cup of China he had 2 underrotated Quad Flips and an underrotated Quad Salchow that were not called. Another big point boost, which would have dropped him in the standings. Then his showing at Grand Prix France was just atrocious, worse than anything Ross Miner did this season, and he again had an underrotated Quad Flip and an underrotated Quad Sal that were not called, which would have dropped him another spot in the competition.
So WHERE is the "body of work" from Vincent Zhou? It's not there. He was not actually better internationally this season than Ross, he simply got extra phantom points for cheated quads that were not called.
I feel bad for Ross but one good skate hardly mean Ross has his jumps - just saying...
IMO, every ISU competition is more important than nationals.
But you can't "say" either that this isn't an uptrend for Ross, that he's not peaking at the right time.
There is this fallacious assumption that consistency can predict the future with certainty, but that is not the case. Peaking also has predictive power. We would have to look at a large sample size and determine whether "peaking skaters" have done better than "consistent skaters."
What the fed did here was to pick who they thought the best three skaters were based on criteria (which they published) and weights that were not disclosed beforehand.
Even if consistency should matter then that argument is better made for Worlds where there are spots at stake.
This booting of the second place finished sets a bad precedent. I really hope that they don't boot a winner in future years.