- Joined
- Apr 5, 2013
My ranking based solely on LP performances I'd like to see again:
#1 = Carolina Kostner =
#2 = Mao Asada =
#3 = Yuna Kim =
#1 = Carolina Kostner =
#2 = Mao Asada =
#3 = Yuna Kim =
All the hair dye in the world could not help Gracie win the gold. Anyone that has seen or heard her on the media knows that she is a dumb dyed blonde. You Americans think that you are the best and putting other people down is a joke. Kaetlyn is a beautiful girl and a lovely skater.....she did wonderful for a skater that has been out most of the season due to injuries. I had to respond to your post with negativity because that's all people like you deserve. No wonder other countries dislike Americans the way they do.
Do you know the criteria for PCS? If yes, do you find it probable that Adelina would go from 8.64 in SS to 9.18, from 8.50 in TR to 8.96 and from 8.86 in CH to 9.50 in the one month between Euros and the Olympics?
Adelina was massively overscored in PCS and could have won even without this. Her 69.60 PCS at Europeans, which was generous already, would have still given her the win here and I'm willing to bet that there would be far less people crying foul if she got that. She helped her cause by skating very well, but if they were going to give her the win anyway, they could at least have been subtle about it.
No wonder why the Russians were so upset Plushenko couldn't compete. It would've been a guaranteed gold medal.
Of course, Tara Lipinski said Adelina should have won, saying the skater with heart should win. Those were the same reasons bolstering her win in Nagano (vs. the artistically superior Kwan).
adelina's pcs are on a par perhaps with gracie or ashey wagner so maybe early 8s, definitely not 9s. makes me laff.
if this was judged fairly she would get perhaps 65-66 on PCS and not 74 which is way overinflation. completely no finesse, looks like a little girl on the ice and just does not move me to watch,
Do you even know the criteria for level 4 step sequence? This isn't based on Opinion. There is criteria you have to meet with how many turns, how much you do on one foot, going in both directions, etc. When you see a very short (comparatively speaking) step sequence it should already raise a red flag to you as a spectator that they are at risk of losing a level if they hit flats on the turns, hop turns (which you will likely not see without Dartfish and the right video angles) etc.
This is why a lot of up and coming skaters have these really LONG and overloaded step sequences. To make sure they can hit Level 4 even if there is a hiccup or two in it. They may lose some GOE for Quality, but they'll still get their levels and that affects the GOE Factor. Losing levels is a big deal. It's like getting '<' on a jump, somewhat.
There is criteria for this. You cannot say "Since X got Level 4, Y should too!" It makes literally no sense and shows the general naivety of the mass viewing public when it comes to this sport. People aren't educated enough to understand how the numbers actually work.
Same with PCS. People here treat PCS like it's on "Maturity/Beauty" mark when there is a ton of criteria in all of those PCS categories. Just cause someone was an 8.5 last month doesn't necessarily mean they can't be a 9 today...
Gracie and Ashley should be receiving better PCS that Adelina. Adelina's no different from Slutskaya. If this was ten years ago in Russia Irina would have beaten Michelle like this.
Wasting time asking questions like "Can someone tell me how Adelina is better than Kostner in PCS" misses the point that Adelina totally outskated Kostner in the FS and rightfully beat her by 5+ points like she should have given Kostner's jumps and spins in that program, as well as the coffee breaks in the choreography.
Same goes for Yuna. Sotnikova was on fire. Yuna did crossovers around the rink predominately in one direction and did less technical content and more spins. In order to not penalize Yuna's PCS (like it actually should have been) for those mediocre programs, the judges decided to just boost Sotnikova's because she gave a better performance.
Again, Numbers are only a means to an end. The placements are what matters.
Perhaps a separate PCS panel with the judging panel again giving GOE marks for performance?
9.5 for "choreography." I just can't, Ziggy. It's a travesty.
I agree and where is "heart" on the score sheet? This is why people think skating is not a real sport.
Wow - all of this (both this comment and others) seem pretty unnecessary. How about we all salute ALL these wonderful skaters instead of having to put them down for whatever reason you feel the need to?
No.
I'm going to stop you right there. You do not get to say crap like that.
You have been not just one of the worst haters, you have been THE worst hater of Sotnikova.
We can't even count the number of times you've called her a headcase and said disparaging things about her. Adelina essentially just told all her haters - including you, sky_fly - to shove it with a gold-winning performance (or at least a performance worthy of the podium).
Stop trying to pretend like you haven't been one of her biggest haters, all along. None of us are buying that.