Not surprising, what does she have to lose after all?
Not surprising, what does she have to lose after all?
As for delayed medal awarding and reallocation, there’s also the infamous gold medal awarded at the food court of the Atlanta airport. (I fly through ATL regularly. It’s one of those places that’s busy enough that anything really can happen there. Including food court Olympic medal handoffs.)
Not surprising, what does she have to lose after all?
As I think I said earlier in this thread, Jamie Sale admitted even having a second revised medal ceremony at the actual 2002 Games, just days after the controversial first ceremony, didn't give her the same glowing feeling.Maybe an unpopular opinion but if I was getting a delayed medal because of some long drawn out doping case I think I'd prefer a funny story of getting medals at the airport burger joint vs. the run of the mill ceremony years down the line that IMO won't have the shine of had it happened at the actual Games it was earned.
I think it's for show.
What would there be to investigate in this case? Eteri would say the same things she said to RUSADA. RUSADA are the one's who caught Valieva and provisionally suspended her after all back in 2022.The evidence is not there because they were not able to investigate properly since they do not have enough powers. That's why they want to redefine things prior to the next games.
I guess the problem with this is that there are quite a few people who could be considered a coach, and that could be hard to implement. Like if you see someone every few weeks for choreography, are you going to be suspended for 3 months even if you had literally nothing to do with it?An automatic 3 month suspension for the coach for the first offense, 6 months for the second one, etc until a life-time ban will never happen but it could be implemented without further inquiries.
This is a two-way deal where an athlete cannot be sacrificed by a coaching team and vice versa.
Every athlete would need to designate a main coach. Simple as that. I don't think David Wilson would be suspended for doing choreo with a skater who gets suspended. There is no need to make this complicated.I guess the problem with this is that there are quite a few people who could be considered a coach, and that could be hard to implement. Like if you see someone every few weeks for choreography, are you going to be suspended for 3 months even if you had literally nothing to do with it?
I think the idea is there, but it would be very hard to implement in practice.
Of course. I am hardcore . It implies a real culture change in some countries . I don't think some coaches would be afraid to lose their job as they trust their athletes But I'd like it, especially when athletes are minor.The idea to suspend the coach when their athlete has doped is not applicable. No coach would ever take that risk to coach anybody anymore, you cannot and are not supposed to control every inch of your athlete's life - but even more importantly I don't think it's possible from a legal point of view.
I get what you're saying, and I know that it's unlikely to be implemented, but I just see a bunch of technical issues with this. Like, for the Valieva case, who says the main coach has to be Eteri? Why can't it be some random dude and then they get suspended instead of the people who actually did anything.Every athlete would need to designate a main coach. Simple as that. I don't think David Wilson would be suspended for doing choreo with a skater who gets suspended. There is no need to make this complicated.
The point is this : the main coach, the one responsible for the athlete, gets suspended if their athlete is caught for doping. No need to say that the coach had nothing to do with it because the athlete got their supplements from the physio or some other minor coach.... It doesn't matter what happened. As soon as there is a positive doping test, the main coach gets suspended as well. That means that the main coaches would make sure their athletes play fair, or else they also lose their jobs
ETeri is her coach. The one who gets the praise gets the suspensionsI get what you're saying, and I know that it's unlikely to be implemented, but I just see a bunch of technical issues with this. Like, for the Valieva case, who says the main coach has to be Eteri? Why can't it be some random dude and then they get suspended instead of the people who actually did anything.