I see that julia had problems on some jumps and needed to be flawless on her completed jumps and all technical elements to beat a 3 triple Mao and needs to improve her pcs.
She really needs to fix those URs. How long can they rely on generous PCS to save her?
I am more and more worried about Mao's jumps. 3 Flips got downgraded in the competition and she cannot even land a 2A-3T without <<.
Is this still the girl who could perform 3A and two 3-3 in one program?
what do you mean how long? the last two world championships, she didn't get any generous PCS whatsoever.
what do you mean how long? the last two world championships, she didn't get any generous PCS whatsoever.
She did get the second highest PCS, 60pts, in Nice with TES of 45 which was 14th highest scores. It WAS generous.
Asada landed only one clean triple in last Worlds FS, and earned the second highest PCS (60.02) only next to Kostner (65.72). Suzuki landed six triples and her PCS was 59.24.
mikeko666 said:Asada landed only one clean triple in last Worlds FS, and earned the second highest PCS (60.02) only next to Kostner (65.72). Suzuki landed six triples and her PCS was 59.24.
Yes, in Nice Akiko was underscored, and so was wagner (in the PCS, I mean), when asada was well-rewarded: her program deserved something around 60, maybe 59... here, her PCS was ok: she is a swan on the ice, I LOVE this choreography, it looks like ballet on the ice, her skating is so soft and elegant, but, yes, she could improve the speed and the transitions in the first half, but, with this almost clean performance (not considering the UR, which shouldn't affect the PCS, beacuse they are not "evident" mistakes), she deserved AT LEAST 63, I thought she could have recived even 65-66 (for me, at least, but everyone has his/her own taste)...I'd argue that this is more a case of Akiko being low-balled, like she sadly always is.
Who else should have beaten Mao on PCS?
Alena Leonova? Ksenia Makarova? Look at that ladies field, 2nd highest PCS is not that much of an accomplishment....there's only Ashley worth discussing, but she wasn't in the last group (I hate how the PCS depend on what group you are skating in, but it's nothing new, really).
I'd argue that this is more a case of Akiko being low-balled, like she sadly always is.
Who else should have beaten Mao on PCS?
Alena Leonova? Ksenia Makarova? Look at that ladies field, 2nd highest PCS is not that much of an accomplishment....there's only Ashley worth discussing, but she wasn't in the last group (I hate how the PCS depend on what group you are skating in, but it's nothing new, really).
Do you mean a skater with just one clean triple deserves 60 for PCS? Asada's popped jumps disrupted the programs from the beginning to the end.
Personally, I think Liza's PCS should be the highest among the Russian girls. She's underscored compared to others.Julia's PCS ( even her debut) is almost same as with Adelina, Elizaveta has the lowest PCS amongst the 3.
though I think the highest chance to increase her PCS is Adelina with Liza the lowest, judges seem to to prefer Julia and Adelina than to Liza
Suzuki wuz robbed!Asada landed only one clean triple in last Worlds FS, and earned the second highest PCS (60.02) only next to Kostner (65.72). Suzuki landed six triples and her PCS was 59.24.
There are several technical elements in a program besides jumps. All of Mao's non-jump elements were well-executed (+GOE). So basically you're trying to argue that Julia should have won over Mao simply because she completed more triple jumps, but that difference is already reflected in their respective base values (the difference here would have been higher if Julia hadn't botched one of her last spins, making it a level 1).
What I like most about Julia is her confidence and attack; there was not much of that there today. Without that and with her mistakes on elements, there was not much to enjoy about her program. Mao's program flowed well even with the jump mistakes. If you haven't already, please watch Mao's and Julia's performances back to back, like they were during the competition, and maybe you'll understand what I mean.
mikeko666 said:Do you mean a skater with just one clean triple deserves 60 for PCS? Asada's popped jumps disrupted the programs from the beginning to the end.
Personally, I think Liza's PCS should be the highest among the Russian girls. She's underscored compared to others.
Suzuki wuz robbed!
Mao had 4 triples in her SP & LP. Three of them were 3Lo, and the other was 3S. No 3-3, and her most difficult jump was 3Lo.
(If Chan had won with those jump contents... I'm sure someone might have said 'overscored' or something... )
I think Mao's other qualities are superior to Julia, so she should get high PCS. But Mao needs to work on her jumps if she wants to win Worlds, or next Olympic.
So what did she deserve in your opinion? What component should have been lower?
And I don't care much for the exact number a skater gets in PCS, I'm mainly looking at the relation between skaters - events are scored differently anyway and I have to admit I'm not exactly having a strong imagination where the difference between a 7 and a 7.25 lies - I know if something should be a 8 or a 9 for me, but the rest...
Despite that, Mao popped 3 of her jumps - and not all of them like you make it sound. The 3S got an UR call, but underrotations are hardly disrupting a program, just if they're additionally flawed - like two-footed or resulting in a stand still - which didn't happen with Maos.
And to answer your question: if a skater goes out there and does 7 triple jumps, all with UR call but all of them nearly not visible to the naked eye without slow motion - than yes, I think that skater could get huge PCS without having done one clean triple. And I think that would be completly rightfully so.
@FSGMT: completly agreed Mao still lacks more power and speed, but she looked solid and has other great qualities to her skating. I think her score is fair.