I'm still catching up on the GPF, but per usual there is consternation about the the scores. Especially in the PCS. My background is in dressage (equestrian) and the scoring there is similar in someways - each move is given a numeric score and then there are composite scores based on the overall quality of the horse and rider. After that the judge writes some comments - 3 or 4 sentences - to explain the scores. Coming up through the levels (never got too high), I valued the comments as good constructive criticism.
Can we expect ISU judges to do the same? Would it help?
Can we expect ISU judges to do the same? Would it help?