What's odd is that you can't see the gaping holes in your own statements. Take your most recent post (please!): are you now claiming that Carolina's layout next year will be similar in difficulty to Yuna's Olympic layout? And how would you know that? Because her current layout certainly is not, clean or otherwise. I could, I guess, make the claim that Yuna is going to compete and have layouts featuring quads and 3As, and if she pulled it off then no one's going to beat her, although the chances are slim...Yes, a clean Yuna will beat a clean Caro with the same technical content. That's the whole point. It will take her Olympic performance to beat a clean Caro next year. The chance of Caro being clean is slim, but that's the whole point of the thread, correct? I said "assuming Caro is clean in the SP, and didn't double the flip in the LP, who can challenge her?"
Why are people arguing about non-said stuff?
Seems like there's a rabid Yuna fan who's arguing on and on about some odd thing.
And if that's where you're finally landing, then what's the useful point, pray tell, of comparing that hypothetical Carolina program with Yuna's actual results, as opposed to the hypothetically clean renditions of those programs?
Aside from observing that posters with skater's names in their user handles should not, in my view, be throwing stones (it's an offense against taste, if nothing else), my only suggestion is that that you go back and re-read your own posts for coherency, because they exhibit more travel from post to post than a novice biellmann.
Last edited: