I can agree with you partly that there were more transitions in their program than in VT's but still there was no such a crutial difference in this aspect in my opinion or that HUGE difference that you saw.
So you agree S/S should have won at least on Tr mark and they didn't. That was the point, not that V/T didn't deserve to win overall. We were complaining about how PCS are scored together as whole rather than separately.