- Joined
- Jul 11, 2003
Two dimentional Quads or any other jump on tape that is deemed underrotated by a poster, are strictly in the eye of the poster. More than JMO.
Well, UR or not, that program is not well-choreographed and the music cuts are bad. Chan should demand his money back. It's essentially a collection of elements designed to get points, and while some would argue this is a CoP thing, I think we've seen skaters do high-scoring elements while still skating an artistically meaningul program.Two dimentional Quads or any other jump on tape that is deemed underrotated by a poster, are strictly in the eye of the poster.
It's no secret here that I am not overly fond of Chan as a skater and find the hype about him off-putting, so do take that into account. With that caveat, I think the answer for me is yes and no.Do you think you're opinion of the program would improve with a better viewing of it (ie, professional taping) along with a better performance (ie, less than four falls and cleaner triples). I have issues with the music cuts as well, but I wonder if the program itself could improve over the season to overcome your objections.
The good news for him is, it's July. He has plenty of time to make considerable changes to the LP. Without making some changes, though, I don't see how this can be a good program. It might serve him well, but that's not the same thing.
I think the purpose of a "B" competition is get programs out there and then fix them up Call it Tweaking if you like. I doubt any fan will see the exactsame program from a "B" competition to a "GP" to a Nats to an Oly to a Worlds.Well, UR or not, that program is not well-choreographed and the music cuts are bad. Chan should demand his money back. It's essentially a collection of elements designed to get points, and while some would argue this is a CoP thing, I think we've seen skaters do high-scoring elements while still skating an artistically meaningul program.
IMO, a skater should be hit with low component scores on choreo, interpretation and P&E for something like that. There is no real artistic merit to that program, for which I blame Lori Nichol, not Patrick. He has the talent to do better, and she should have provided him with a vehicle that would allow him to shine. POTO is not that vehicle in its current form. And next season, the tango comparison may not be to Chan's benefit in the SP; Dai has a better one.
One could interpret the bit about the programs of the 6.0 era being easier despite the quads as disrespectful towards the skaters who did them - that includes Plush.
But I don't recall any specific negative comments made by Chan regarding Plushenko.
This early in the season it's the cut of the music that turns me off to this POTO for Patrick.
I love the POTO score - most of the "songs" are strong and powerful but to me that power is not sustained in the cuts chosen. With the choppy cut there's no way for him to relate to the music as it doesn't stay with one "theme" long enough. As the music is what drives the performance for me, even with better execution, it's going to be hard for me to like it. Will wait and see how they "tweak" it before the GP and reserve the right to change my mind depending on what happens with it in the meantime.
According to a recent news clip, Mao Asada has been allegedly training a 3Lo-3 Lo! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N-f_zDL_GEs
Well then you are in the minority. People at the competition were raving about the intricacy of transitions and choreography - his feet do not stop moving. A lot of people do not like the music cuts but I will wait to see it on TV and live to make my judgements on that.
I think you should actually read my post before replying to it. I wrote that the program is constructed specifically to get points, and would probably be effective in that regard if skated cleanly. I did not write that it should be marked badly on TR and SS. The thing is, there are plenty of programs that are designed to get points, and it doesn't make them good programs as a whole, or artistically meaningful. But it is possible to do both things (think of Savchenko and Szolkowy: difficult programs, but ones that also form a coherent and artistic whole).I think Buttercup need to separate how much he/she likes the program and how good it is in terms of the rules of skating.
I don't particularly like the program at all, but as a judge I would shower it with high SS,CH,and TR scores at least.
Joubert couldn't skate that program for his life.
I didn't say it was my interpretation . Certainly some parts of today's programs are harder than in the past. But it was an unfortunately phrased remark; still, since I was not present when it was made, I lack the context to know exactly what was meant by it.museksk8r said:I don't see how a comment like that can be interpreted as disrespectful when it is the truth though, and I don't think Chan intended that comment to be disrespectful. I've seen video and read interviews from 6.0 skaters when they admit that the COP programs now are much more difficult than the programs they had to do when looking at the harder step sequences and spin requirements under COP. Skaters could more likely get away with wrong edge takeoffs and under-rotated jumps in the 6.0 era too.
According to the staff blog of THE ICE, Takahiko will show his new SP, rock music by Jimi Hendrix, in THE ICE
http://weblog.ctv.co.jp/figure/top
(Japanese only...)
We can see it tomorrow!