Has Cesario been getting hit with UR jumps this season? Or last season?
No, at least not at this past nationals
http://www.usfigureskating.org/leaderboard/results/2013/68390/CAT001SEG002.html
Click plus sign + to see protocols for a skater.
Has Cesario been getting hit with UR jumps this season? Or last season?
Just watched MIYAHARA's FS and not sure why some thought her program is lovely. Same here as before, she barely has any facial expression on her face (much worse than Julia)
No, at least not at this past nationals
http://www.usfigureskating.org/leaderboard/results/2013/68390/CAT001SEG002.html
LOL Nationals judging.
(if I use Mao's upper body movement as textbook example, I mean as my understanding of good upper body movement, head and neck included).
Don't Russia, USA and Canada all get 14 JGP spots for finishing as the top 3 countries?And thanks to that funny judging I think the US Junior Ladies loses a few JGP spots this fall. Bleh. As if we needed fewer spots for the junior ladies in the U.S.
She barely gets off the ice and her knee bend is so deep on the landings, I'm almost expecting her to hit the ice with the free leg every time she lands. That being said, she actually got lower PCS than TES at this competition - just to put into perspective how ridiculous her PCS really were.
This is what I fel too.I'm sad because Cesario got a 4th here. Losing to Pogorilaya was unacceptable. Crowd booed a bit, but they should have protested more, as well as the USA federation (what can they do in that situation? In gymnastics, you can protest scores related to the Difficult of the program, something like the base value in figure skating)
My opinion on all of this: First of all: technicall callers have too much power. They can basically decide who wins and who loses. The judges have to give negative or 0 goe when the jump was given a ur call, even if they thought the jump was fine. The other problem is that there's no clear definition of a take-off and landing, not enough details regarding the definition of technicall elements.
Second: Judges don't help when they give pcs totally based on the reputation of the skater. They simply chose a mark, and repeat it for almost all pcs, except for transitions, which is a little lower. PCS should be judged by a separated panel, imo.
But an even bigger problem is this OBSESSION with rotations, under rotations and so on. A competition like that is what happens when the tech panel doesn't let the skaters skate. Horrible results that don't reflect the actual performances.
She's so short, how high is she really supposed to get off the ice though? Who can jump higher- an adult or a small child? They are always so strict with her.
Cesario had only one ur call at JGP Austria too. So it is not just a matter of nationals judging.
Don't Russia, USA and Canada all get 14 JGP spots for finishing as the top 3 countries?
I wonder if Daleman and Chartrand will skate JGP or senior next season?
She also lacks polish. Her movements were really awkward.
Definitely.
Radionova is 13, Lipnitskaya is 14. Why can't they skate to something lighter, more fun, more upbeat? Why the dreary classical music?
People here would say them juvenile if they did.
People here would say them juvenile if they did.
This is what I fel too.
But forget the URs and compare the base value of Pogorilaya and Cesario:
Pogorilaya: 58,02
Cesario: 46,45
Cesario lost before the FS began.
#1 That's my understanding. I don't think the US lost anything with these placements?
#2 They don't really have anything to lose, I'd expect them to remain #2 & #3 in Canada going forward. If Osmond gets a 2nd spot for the Olympics they're guaranteed to move up. Everyone wants to go to the Olympics. But then I guess they'd have problems with getting GP slots a la Osmond and they did just get 14 JGP spots here so...