Maybe you could clarify your meaning? Do you mean Canada now has 2 top competitive level teams? Both the U.S. and Canada have more than just two senior pairs teams. The U.S. currently still has more depth among senior pairs than does Canada. And Canada currently has better depth in Junior pairs than the U.S.When you look at the American Pair situation you can see the similarities as to levels with the Canadians now that Canada appears to have two teams.
The difference now, of course, is that James/Radford are expected to be more competitive among the top echelon internationally than Walsh/Michaud, and possibly more than Moore-Towers/ Marinaro.
I think it's clear that the U.S. has three very competitive teams internationally, two of whom have top-notch elements capable of matching up with top teams in the world -- if Calalang/Johnson have shored up their jump weaknesses, and with Knierim/Frazier bringing to the ice more experience together and stronger confidence in their partnership.
The U.S. also has a strong up-and-coming team in Lu/Mitrofanov, who are fast improving and need competitive opportunities to continue their pace of improvement. Meanwhile, Cain-G/LeDuc are highly competitive at top of second tier at least, at their best with stronger belief in themselves and with programs that enhance their strengths.
Last edited: