I just think it's absurd to try to draw conclusions off a ridiculously limited sample size. And further to do it across disciplines where there are wildly different rest periods after the team competition.
To back up my contention, lets take a comprehensive look at all the instances of skaters skating both ends of the team competition:
Lets start with the pairs, since they have the shortest turnaround times, just 5 days between shorts and 4 days between longs. There have been six instances:
Castelli/Shnapir (2014) - Finished 9th in pairs event, finished even lower at Worlds
Berton/Hotarek (2014) - Finished 11th in pairs event, finished 9th at Worlds with a 5 point improvement
Takahashi/Kihara (2014) - Finished 18th in the pairs event and did not advance to long, similar at Worlds
Knierims (2018) - Finished 15th in pairs event, performed very similarly at Worlds
Suzuki/Kihara (2018) - Finished 21st in the pairs event and did not advance to long, similar at Worlds
Duhamel/Radford - Won bronze in pairs event, then retired
Assessments: Small sample size, but there doesn't appear to be any detriment to doing both ends of the teams event even in spite of the extremely short turnaround between Team and Pairs events at the Olympics. The biggest LP meltdown was Tarasova/Morozov in 2018, and they only skated the short in the Team