Then I can only envy in what fairyland you live. The calling this whole season was atrocious. Let's take the latest event for example. In 4CC ladies SP we have HUGE, huge, huge URs everywhere shamelessly ignored. Kaori Sakamoto's 3Lo, Young You's 3A, Rika Kihira's 3A, Wakaba Higuchi's 3T - all of them were so clearly URed that TP just can't not notice that. Moreover, some of these jumps were landed badly - and such landings are ALWAYS should be checked by TP, especially in SP. What we have though? Clear protocols. Don't you think it's just unfair to Tennell, for example - who rotated all her jumps fully? Why she should bother to train her jumps to such extent then? Only because ISU judges wants to save face of international top ladies and tries to uphold their reputation as "clean rotators" before Russians ladies in WC to make an illusion of equal competition there - they are willing to distort calling that much? Or what? Still they dinged Chen's 3Lo with UR as she isn't considered top skater. I know what it is. It is "reputational calling", pure and simple. Disgusting.
We know nothing about what makes them do their decisions. Unfortunately. But that's the point! We need to introduce this TP observing system - exactly to know that. What it will change? Well, at least it can help to avoid the usual "incompetence" we can see in calling. See the above.
What--have a video of the technical panel making their decisions? I don't know what that could possibly show that would help anything, unless they are deciding by flipping a coin (which I assume they are not). And we do know what causes them to make their decisions--what they see on the ice and on the replay. These decisions have to be made in a very short time. The panel doesn't have the time that obsessive fans do to go back and review each jump multiple times in slow-motion/backwards and forwards. Is the judging always right? Probably not. But that is not uncommon in other sports. For example, in baseball, balls and strikes are not subject to review, even when computerized strike zones show the umpire got it wrong. And challenges to the calls on the field are not unlimited--3, I think. So some mistakes no doubt go uncorrected. By and large, I think the technical panels get it right. I do think the rule generally should be, when in doubt, advantage to the skater.