- Joined
- Jun 21, 2003
Ok, one more thing.
The only reason that Dick is in the final two instead of Dustin is because Big Brother intervened and instructed Eric to get rid of Dustin and keep Dick.
The only reason Zach was in the final three instead of Amber is because Big Brother instructed Eric to keep Zach in the game and vote out Amber.
How is this a fair game? The referee (Big Brother) was cheating for one player against another. How can you say Dick and Danielle played a great game, when Big Brother jumped into the game as a player every time the house tried to vote them out?
It's like figure skating judging. When the judges are crooked, advancing the fortunes of one skater and dumping on another, what kind of contest is that?
Somebody should sue. :yes:
The only reason that Dick is in the final two instead of Dustin is because Big Brother intervened and instructed Eric to get rid of Dustin and keep Dick.
The only reason Zach was in the final three instead of Amber is because Big Brother instructed Eric to keep Zach in the game and vote out Amber.
How is this a fair game? The referee (Big Brother) was cheating for one player against another. How can you say Dick and Danielle played a great game, when Big Brother jumped into the game as a player every time the house tried to vote them out?
It's like figure skating judging. When the judges are crooked, advancing the fortunes of one skater and dumping on another, what kind of contest is that?
Somebody should sue. :yes:
Last edited: