The higher end Paramount blades have runners fabricated from stainless steel. In a curious marketing strategy, they offer the blades in both 420 (specifically 420HC) and 440 (specifically 440C) stainless steel, with the 440 costing substantially more than the 420. If the 440 holds its edge substantially longer than the 420, then the extra initial cost may be worth it, if fewer sharpenings are needed over the service life of the blade. Edge retention is not simply a function of the alloy, however; it also depends on the specific mechanical and thermal treatment, so you can't make any general statement of 420 v. 440. I wrote to Paramount for edge retention comparison of their 420 v. 440; but the answer I got appears to have been written by a marketing guy, rather than an engineer, so I didn't get the info I was looking for.
Forum members: Anyone skate on both 420 and 440 Paramount blades? If so, how did their edge retention compare? I'd be interested even if you're not comparing the same model blade. Answers I'm looking for are along the line of:
"I first skated in Paramount Model __ in 420. I typically needed to have them sharpened after __ hrs of skating. I then switched to Paramount Model ___ in 440. I typically needed to have them sharpened after __ hrs of skating."
Forum members: Anyone skate on both 420 and 440 Paramount blades? If so, how did their edge retention compare? I'd be interested even if you're not comparing the same model blade. Answers I'm looking for are along the line of:
"I first skated in Paramount Model __ in 420. I typically needed to have them sharpened after __ hrs of skating. I then switched to Paramount Model ___ in 440. I typically needed to have them sharpened after __ hrs of skating."