- Joined
- Jan 12, 2018
Tale as old as time
From the OP:
Who was the "other judge" who was even more biased in favor of Anericans than the American judge was?
Tale as old as time
From the OP:
Who was the "other judge" who was even more biased in favor of Anericans than the American judge was?
Adam needs to be Lumiere!
The Hungarian judge, plus the article's wrong, the Canadian judge also gave Nathan more marks than the American judge. It's all on SkatingScores.com.
http://skatingscores.com/2018/ote/men/short/tss/
The Hungarian judge, plus the article's wrong, the Canadian judge also gave Nathan more marks than the American judge. It's all on SkatingScores.com.
http://skatingscores.com/2018/ote/men/short/tss/
Speaking of....I think Google has picked up the whispers because on today's doodle, the octopus landed an octo-jump and a fellow octopus judge gave him a perfect score while the alligator and squirrel gave him a 7.2/8 and 5.9/8 respectively :roll9:
When V/M won, French tabloids kept accusing the Canadian judge for being biased in their favor. That was not even a week ago. 4 years ago it was the Russians favoring their own, with former Soviet Union countries backing them up.
What's new on all this that it makes the news?
Why is the U.S. singled out for this? This is NOT uncommon! All countries (whether or not people will admit it) do this! No surprise.
I am sorry to be callous, I know that many people are not as cynical as I am. But I came up in the 70s, when the skating judging was based far more in nationalities than these articles describe. The Eastern bloc scored the Eastern bloc skaters too highly and the North Americans did the same for North Americans. When you had true agreement, like Torvill & Dean, it was a minor miracle.
For me, saying judges may score their own skaters more highly is like saying the sun rose in the East today.
Me too. Skating fan since 1968. It has always been thus.