- Joined
- Dec 9, 2019
I do agree that Patrick Chan's Chopin is a masterpiece of choreography and interpretation! (Only the cuts exasperate me but I'm so demanding when it's Chopin. I'm sorry, I stick to it.) I'm sorry if my wording let you think anything different. I can tell you that coming from me it's a huge compliment! He chose pieces well played (to the piano! I positively hate any orchestration of Chopin's pieces for piano, including the ballet Chopiniana; but piano pieces need more precision in... skating skills), with a constant tempo, which is not how Chopin would play them, but in my opinion they're truer to Chopin than some delirious interpretations (now rare, fortunately), a great part of Chopin's work being on counterpoint which must be respected, in particular.??? this is Patrick's Chopin is a masterpiece of choreography and interpretation. Chopin's music can be played differently by different pianists... some only see the shallow virtuosity of it.. because of the flourishes... others do it justice and make the piano sing at all times. Patrick's skating is very lyrical in his Chopin program and to me, shows he understands the music. His 4CC performance remains the ultimate interpretation by a figure skater of Chopin in my opinion. His skating is all about the music and in this case, it's not a flaw... It's the old concept of " less is more" ... and it's not like he is doing nothing !
I won't get into a debate about other skaters, but I guess this thread is very relevant because some people seem to confuse skating skills, a deep level of interpretation and performance versus showmanship. Patrick can be a showman (in galas for instance) but understood how to skate to the pieces that were put together for his Chopin. Also, the pieces were well "glued" together and created a real Chopin experience. It's not always the case in recent Chopin programs.... You have heard me loud and clear about this in the past, so I will just stick to the topic. I have seen a bunch of skaters live and Patrick can generate speed and flow with only a couple strokes like no others.. It is actually extremely difficult to skate like this and this is why some skaters will chose to include more small turns and steps and overload the programs with transitions. While they do this, it camouflages that lack of ease and power obtained by really good technique. It is actually them who are, in my opinion, taking advantage of the judging system.
I was purely speaking of the level of skating skills, not of interpretation. With his choice of pianistic interpretation in even rhythms, Patrick Chan gave himself the means of delivering a beautiful, coherent interpretation, expression of the music, which his exceptional skating skills allowed him, and I agree that extremely few other skaters may be, or would have been able of it. Plus, he's a rather reserved skater in his interpretations, another reason to choose even rhythms. Both are a joy to watch.
What I mean, is that exceptional as they are, his skating skills (not any lack of musicality) would not allowed him to interpret a piece played "as Chopin would have played", because he wouldn't have been able to make his skates follow the rhythm alterations. Jeffrey Buttle's choreography was indeed so extremely demanding, even for Yuzuru Hanyu (who didn't have as much smoothness and precision as Patrick Chan in 2014), that he really skated it completely only from 2017. This is not a program overloaded with transitions, this is a perfect program. Had there been too many transitions for this program, by the way, if this is what you're suggesting, this would have justified a higher Transitions score, but a lower Interpretation score, and Yuzuru Hanyu knew that he couldn't expect any leniency from the judges, so what are you speaking about? He was able to express the fire in the music. Able not only in musicality, but also in skating skills.