I appreciate this post, namely cause it reminds me that when we're talking during the competition threads that folks are coming from a variety of perspectives on what value they find in wathcing figure skating or watching any sport.
I know that might seem sort of dumb to mention here, but it does allow me to better see where people are coming from.
I often see athletes in the lens of their processes and competitive mindsets namely because I truly believe that raw talent and ability is only part of the equation. Not surprisingly, I'm drawn more to skaters who have shown competitive mettle through challenges or push against their limit. I am warming up to Nathan a bit, cause he does seem to be a strong competitor and of course the jumps are impressive. I endured being a Shibutanis fan during their dark days because I admire how much they pushed themselves through their challenges and now it's great to see the fruit of that hard work at this competition.
However, it's perfectly OK to me if that's not what you value. Not saying you don't value hard work, of course, but namely understand that some people just like what they like. I guess my only qualm about that is people (not really you, just a general observation) tend to put preferences, mostly subconsciously, when making a case for or against a skater.
This thread seems to have multiple lines of conversation of people who are talking over each other. I'm guilty of that too.
TL;DR: Like what you like; value what you value. Let's just understand where each other is coming from.