Yes, it makes sense that she would. I am really torn on this if it happens. On one hand, it seems kind of silly for the ISU to be worrying about this now. Surely it was foreseeable that if they create a bonus for jumps that are completed in the second half people will start doing them all in the second half to get the bonus. On the other, the entire reason for the bonus was to encourage people to do jumps in the second half because the tendency to do them in he first half to get them out of the way on fresh legs would seem unbalanced. So it makes sense that if all of the jumps completed in the first half appears unbalanced then the same would be true for completing all the jumps in the second half.
I guess I'm resistant to the idea that it is only jumps that can make a program "balanced". I mean if a skater does all three spins in the second half is that unbalanced? If they do StSq immediately followed by ChSq is that unbalanced because there is too much skating not broken up by jumps and spins? It just seems that this rule would open the door to a lot of unnecessary policing when skaters should be able to do their required elements in whatever order they choose as long as they are actually doing their elements (including the spins, StSq, and ChSq) and not just randomly skating around. It also seems unfair that they don't police the pairs in the same way, as pairs often do their jumping elements one after the next in the first half.