- Joined
- May 17, 2017
I still read CS as Counter-StrikePretty sure its the test skates, not a CS.

Sorry, offtopic and wrong fandom
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I still read CS as Counter-StrikePretty sure its the test skates, not a CS.

didn't she know that Yuna left Orser right after OG when she was 19 y.o? :sarcasm:
or his lack of result with Tursynbaeva 18 y.o...

Ummm no, i am moriel everywhere where I am =)
But yep, good thoughts come into good heads together.
Overall, I disagree with that answer you posted. There are many thing that are not just censorship. As I already answered, for PR, the passage where Zhenya says she likes the program was totally unnecessary. But yeah, maybe, "down with censorship and diplomacy", lets see the real Zhenya. But then, we are not expected to like her as a person - so far, I see a reasonably shallow and PR focused young lady with a rather large ego, which is fairly unpleasant.
And just saying: Everyone‘s entitled to have their own opinion but if basically every skater is friendly with Zhenya and journalists and fans all over the world adore her... she can‘t be that much of a monster, can she? 
I was missing her. Many figure skating fans were missing her.
I‘m sure she knows that Yuna left Orser. But I think it‘s more about the general approach of how to train older women. Yuna was 19, that‘s already a woman. And while Gabby isn‘t mainly coached under Orser she‘s also a woman, not a girl. So he does have more experience with mature skaters than Eteri. And even if he isn‘t that successful (that‘s pretty subjective, I‘d say he‘s one of the most successful coaches at the moment, even in women‘s skating...) he is still willing to focus on skater who might have passed a certain age. Eteri... not so much. And that‘s not even her fault, it‘s just a fact that she focuses on junior skaters. In Eteri‘s group there simply were too many youngsters battling for her attention. In Orser‘s group most skaters are adults. Zhenya wanted a change and she chose a coach who‘s trained the 2010 OGM at the age of 19. That‘s not stupid at all. Means he must have done something right...![]()
The best part of the interview is how Vaitsekhovskaya is suddenly all nice with Zhenya =D
Also, from a previous interview, Zhenya on the ditched Averbukh program:
https://www.sports.ru/figure-skating/1056529901.html
vs now


She just looked at that program from a canadian point of view!
P.S. I was saying right from the start that this program is bad. It's completely empty and boring. Dress wasn't good either tbh. Probably she just still has orders for that women who makes dress, thats why she doesn't say bad things about the dresses![]()

Medvedeva was 18 and a couple of months when she won her silver medal, and then left Eteri
Yuna was 19 and a couple of months when she won her gold medal and then left Orser.
The age difference is pretty much a year. Yuna was, like... not really older. I don't see really how there is a difference of approach to train an 18 years old medalist and a 19 years old medalist. I would understand that, for example, the guy who coached Yuna into her SECOND olympic medal knows how to train older woman. The guy who coached Osmond into her olympic medal knows how to train older woman.
Gabby was born in 1998 while Zhenya was born on 1999. Again, this incredible difference of 1 year that means that the coach suddenly knows how to train older women (to be 15th at Olympics, like Gabby?).
Eteri, in ladies, has same results as BOrser olympic-wise. They both are capable of coaching 18-19 years old into medaling at their first olympics. None of them has or had successful 20+ ladies.
Medvedeva was 18 and a couple of months when she won her silver medal, and then left Eteri
Yuna was 19 and a couple of months when she won her gold medal and then left Orser.
The age difference is pretty much a year. Yuna was, like... not really older. I don't see really how there is a difference of approach to train an 18 years old medalist and a 19 years old medalist. I would understand that, for example, the guy who coached Yuna into her SECOND olympic medal knows how to train older woman. The guy who coached Osmond into her olympic medal knows how to train older woman.
Gabby was born in 1998 while Zhenya was born on 1999. Again, this incredible difference of 1 year that means that the coach suddenly knows how to train older women (to be 15th at Olympics, like Gabby?).
Eteri, in ladies, has same results as BOrser olympic-wise. They both are capable of coaching 18-19 years old into medaling at their first olympics. None of them has or had successful 20+ ladies.
Not everything has to be about the results, though. Fair, Tutberidze is very successful, but I'd say her comments such as female body beginning to prepare for motherhood and slowing down when growing up doesn't convey trust that she'd be extremely invested in the further development of adult skaters. She could still be more successful than Orser and dominate the field in the next four years, but I just cannot agree with the philosophy that women in the field would necessarily stagnate with the adulthood. It's extremely harmful, in my opinion. And Evgenia might not even get the results she got with Tutberidze, but at the very least she will try out her chances with someone who doesn't share the same philosophy on training women.
Not everything has to be about the results, though. Fair, Tutberidze is very successful, but I'd say her comments such as female body beginning to prepare for motherhood and slowing down when growing up doesn't convey trust that she'd be extremely invested in the further development of adult skaters. She could still be more successful than Orser and dominate the field in the next four years, but I just cannot agree with the philosophy that women in the field would necessarily stagnate with the adulthood. It's extremely harmful, in my opinion. And Evgenia might not even get the results she got with Tutberidze, but at the very least she will try out her chances with someone who doesn't share the same philosophy on training women.
Edit: And yes, Tutberidze now has a 18-year-old student, but I think it still doesn't negate the fact that she seems to be primarly invested in her junior talents at the moment.
I am just saying that both Eteri and Orser have pretty much same experience in working with older girls, and pretty much same success.
No.I am just saying that both Eteri and Orser have pretty much same experience in working with older girls, and pretty much same success.
I'll admit, that's the part I found to be the oddest about the interview - That she went to Brian Orser due to Yuna. To me, their cases were very paralleled - Yuna won her first Olympics with Orser, yes, but she left immediately after, and Orser handled the departure immaturely. That's the exact same thing that happened with Medvedeva and Eteri. Yuna appeared in two Olympics, but for the second she trained with a completely different coach. Hence, I honestly didn't really understand the point she was making with that comparison and it did seem like it didn't quite fit with what she was saying.
So think about this 8 years into the future. Let's say that Medvedeva with Orser is successful and has a 2022 silver, or gold. Then a random skater x decides that she needs to, at the age of 17 or 18, transfer to Eteri Tutberidze, and quotes "Evgenia Medvedeva" and her success and longevity as the reason for her doing so. Wouldn't it be such a strange thing to say?
Now, this comparison only makes sense if we assume that Yuna in 2010 would also have won the gold if a 15-year-old Zagitova performing these exact same programs in the exact same manner would have lost to her. I don't think it's accurate at all to completely dismiss the 18-year-old Medvedeva's olympic performance simply because someone defeated her in that event.No.
Eteri achieved a gold medal with a 15 year-old.
Brian achieved a gold medal with a 19 year-old.
Zhenya will be 22 in Beijing. Which one her body will resemble more, the 15 or the 19 year-old?
Come on, Moriel. It's not that hard to understand...
My confusion wasn't with recognizing Orser's work with the other older skaters(I know that's the case), simply the Yuna example... It would have made sense if she was switching to the coach that prepared Yuna for her 2014 Olympic performance but in this case... Well, I guess this is not super important, still something about the interview where I didn't really see the logic.Yes, it would because it doesn‘t make sense at all. EVERYONE knows that Eteri DOES NOT TRAIN OLDER SKATERS. Maybe she will do it in the future but for now she simply DID NOT DO IT. I won‘t state the name of „gold-medalist-Korean-skater“ and „gold-medalist-Canadian-skater“ because I will go nuts if I do it. But please, really: Orser trains OLDER women and only them at the moment. (In ladies skating, obviously) You cannot and should not compare this to Eteri Tutberizde who focuses on junior skaters. Really.
Now, this comparison only makes sense if we assume that Yuna in 2010 would also have won the gold if a 15-year-old Zagitova performing these exact same programs in the exact same manner would have lost to her. I don't think it's accurate at all to completely dismiss the 18-year-old Medvedeva's olympic performance simply because someone defeated her in that event.
If she kept Alina in juniors she could have been a "successful" senior coach with a gold medal and we didn't have this debate now![]()
Now we know why Zhenya said that to her: She was just worried for Eteri‘s reputation. 
Ugh, I really hope this'll be the last time I'll need to bring my point across.Nobody is dismissing Medvedeva‘s olympic performance. Just saying that she‘s the only adult skater Eteri ever had. Yes, they achieved great results together and that‘s fine. But to say that Eteri and Orser have the same experience with older female skaters doesn‘t make sense at all and is simply incorrect.