Yes, I know that matters. But your argument could be reduced to interesting concept = choreography and interpretation which isn‘t correct either so there‘s that. To my mind, Sasha has a more interesting concept in her FS than Alena. But the choreography falls flat after the beginning when the difficult jumps start as does her interpretation. Whereas Alena might not have the most unique concept but she has overall a more mature and coherent program, which she interprets very well. To me, the concept is just one part of choreography and doesn‘t even factor in interpretation. Why would it? You can interpret the most interesting program badly but you can also make a boring/not unique program feel lively.
I didn’t say Sasha was terrible at interpreting either. In the SP it’s clear that she isn’t. But her FS is just too focused on the jumps and the choreography and the interpretation aren‘t as pronounced as in Anna‘s or Alena‘s skate for example. Also, all three come from Eteri‘s camp so they have an even amount of transitions. Alena clearly has the best skating skills of the bunch.
So, yes, I don‘t see how Sasha had such high PCS if not for the argument “PCS follows high TES“. And interesting concept is one part of choreography that I‘ll gladly give her credit for but her interpretation and overall choreography is just worse than both Anna and Alena.
