Sigh... I wish PCS actually meant something. Compare Nathan Chen getting such high PCS and skating skills marks. Crazy. You're telling me that his skating skills are as good as Patrick Chan? That's flipping insane. What is the point of developing excellent skating skills and blade control when they're worth less than a double axel difference?!
The Eteri girls do NOT have solid skating skills. Kamila is better than the others, but watch the scraping blade skills and muscled jumps. Watch, for example, Valieva on her combinations. Amazing jump, RESET and SWING whole body into the combination. No flow, often landed on the flat, no running edge, jumps impossible to do without massive prerotation and crazy muscled body swing.
Contrast that, for example to (eg) Osmond. Cp. the height, speed, running edge, flow, etc.
Now, I know we're talking about PCS in general. Eteri skaters typically cover up poor blade skills with excessive amounts of extensions, and scratchy turns.
Judges need to QUIT marking in a tunnel. They should realize that it's totally fine (and the RIGHT thing to do) to be willing to give a skater super strong technical marks, while at the same realizing they have crappy skating skills and components.
It frustrates me to see the top men separated often by 10, 20, 30, or even 40 points in technical scores, yet only a point or two in PCS. Where is the incentive to have Jason Brown-level choreography, or develop Patrick Chan level skating skills? There SHOULD be.
Judges should be willing to give a skater with top 3 technical scores PCS's below the top 10 if necessary.
All that to say that, no, the Eteri girls would NOT be winning non-jumping competitions if skating skills were rewarded as they should be.