Also, last comment from me as I need to go to sleep to function at work tomorrow. But, after taking the stance of supporting the lab, there is also a bit of a reason to doubt them, as well. This puts me back to 50/50, so I’m going to have another restless night again.
What a coincidence that the sample was received on the 19th and they fulfilled their obligation exactly on the 20th day? If samples were actually received on the 18th and post dated, one day is the difference between meeting the 20 day obligation or not. Also, with them using Covid as an excuse for why they took so long due to staff shortage, I don’t think it is unreasonable to doubt if the samples were received on the 19 or not. I guess I now fully understand the Russians comment in regards to did someone walk to lab from RUS to SWE? It only hit me now that it took 25 days for the sample to arrive to the lab and if it didn’t go out by boat, I do find it suspicious that it took so long to get to the lab. Therefore, It is within the realm of possibility that a lab could alter the dates when finding out they were outside the 20 day window in order to have their results accepted as valid. But, there is a case of reasonable doubt, as I’m now back to questioning the lab as 50/50 again. I’m back to feeling dizzy about this whole situation