- Joined
- Oct 27, 2006
how come the host country does not get a third spot at the world championships like they do at the grand prix stops?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
TrueTo me, it is not so clear that this would help the U.S. ladies. At the moment, thr pre-season rankings have only one U.S. lady in the top six. Caroline Zhang is a scant 12 points ahead of Sarah Meier for sixth place.
yes since everyon play by the same rule it is technically fair.That could change -- for better or for worse -- after the Grand Prix, of course.Oh, I disagree completely. All competition is fair as long as they skate on the same ice and under the same rules. If you are an up-and-comer and you want to make the world team, you have to knock out whoever is above you --
For the best competion tune into the GP and Nationals but you won't see at the main event, Worlds.( I'm exaggerating of course. I hope you get my point though.
I doubt the world cares whether one more American can or cannot compete at Worlds next year
The Grand Prix should be set up as qualification for the Worlds/Olys. Any country's skater that doesn't qualify can be sent to Worlds by the respective federation. The SP can serve as the elimination round.
I think it depends if qualifications from 4CC and Europeans was based on point totals or placements. If the same judges and tech pannel could be placed at both events it would make the comparison better. Personally I wouldn't wont to use 4cc or Europeans because they have the three skater per fed limit also. Great skaters still will be left home.But Euros and 4CC are far from equal. 34 federations were represented at Euros, but only 16 at 4CC. Skaters from many countries wouldn't qualify at Euros, while most skaters would at 4CC.
Many European posters on this and other boards have complained that low-ranked 4CC skaters rank higher on the ISU list because it isn't that hard to finish in the top 18 at 4CC in singles, and in the top 10 in Pairs and Dance.
For example, Aganina/Zobnin finished 9th at 4CC in Pairs and got 362 ISU points while earning a total score of 93.77; Piatkowska/Khromin, who ranked 9th at Euros, scored 112.96 points. If A/Z had skated at Euros, they would have finished 14th.
In Ice Dance, O'Brien/Merriman placed 10th and got 325 ISU points with a total score of 121.86; at Euros, Fraser/Lukanin placed 10th with a total score of 168.87. At Euros, O/B would have placed 22nd.
But Euros and 4CC are far from equal. 34 federations were represented at Euros, but only 16 at 4CC. Skaters from many countries wouldn't qualify at Euros, while most skaters would at 4CC.
Are the two competitions equal? They are in the minds of the ISU. Only 16 federations went to 4CC, but 22 COULD have gone. Right now, most of the world thinks the 4CC is just a cheese fest before the World Championship. But if it was a World Championship qualifier, it would turn into a major competition. In fact, the current rule that all federations can send 3 entries to each event would have to be changed.
I don't think there is a rule saying that all fed can send three skaters to 4CC or Europeans. At Europeans the same rule about the number of skaters a fed can send applies as that at worlds.
175. FINLAND, Figure
Rule 378 add new para 4 and renumber current para 4
4. Each Member has the right to apply for one additional ‘wild card’ entry for each category in the World
Championships for a skater/pair/couple placed among the 6 best in the immediately preceding European or Four
Continents Championships. The application must be submitted to the Sports Director immediately after the applicable
regional Championships. The Sports Director and the Vice President will make a decision at the latest 7 days prior to
the closing of the entries for the World Championships.
Reason: It is in the interest of the ISU to have as high a standard as possible in the World Championships.