Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
To me, that is the dilemma that figure skating faces, both as sport and as entertainment.But to just watch skaters clown for the crowd or be generically lovely in flowing dresses....
Hyoen is hard to find on YouTube indeed. Perhaps they have enough audience in Japan... I think all sorts of conceptual shows are interesting, and it's good to hear that producers gain from experience.I feel truly happy that you liked the subforum about ice shows! Actually, I felt so happy that I started there a new thread about old shows (I mentioned you there and also posted the link to Cinderella). Can I hope that you will contribute to it?
I can but agree about Pluschenko's version. I think that the popularity of figure skating in Russia and and his own popularity has served him badly because spectators flock to watch his shows even if the production is below par.
In Japan tough, the competition is harsh and the producers of ice shows need to improve and experiment. Hyoen is my favorite series for the same reason which disappointed you: it's a genre fusion by concept. But, even if you don't like this concept, you can easily notice how much the production has improved between 2017 and, let's say, 2024. (I'm not sure about how much of the latest shows can be found on YouTube though; @synesthesia maybe you could start a thread about Hyoen 2022 and 2024 on YouTube if you have saved some playlists?) What is interesting for me in this series and also in Cirque du Soleil ice shows is how the use of ice allows to interpret the movement and the flow between the segments of the show and, accordingly, what new possibilities it opens for storytelling.
And, regarding Hyoen, I think your criticism is noteworthy because it lists the reasons why figure skating fans outside of Japan may shun these shows and hence I would happily to see your comments in the respective threads of the show subforum where we can discuss the newest productions.
Kassuoya is a show with no talking, skating only, and no decorations at all actually - just lights to create atmo and some choreographically incorporated props here and there. The funny thing is that, by concept it does not have any narrative or story; it's just the flow of emotions that is expressed via choreography. But, since this flow of emotions remains organic, the result does feel like a story when you watch it![]()
Oh yes, Mayuko Oka is indeed a very capable skater, PCS-wise I think she is better than Mao Schimada....In Japan, the development goes this way because they have such abundance of medalists that they can choose the best entertainers to headline their shows. And we can already see the influence on competitive programs here and there, i.e. Mayuko Oka's "peacock" short program...
Thank you for your work!![]()


Like you, I have more confidence. I would have even more if the judges country and name were next to their marks. After reading Oly judge Jon Jackson's book, On Edge, on how the ISU really operates, I will always be skeptical of its actions. IMOH its a shame that the USFS attempt to expose it and take it down failed..... and the ISU is still failing us. A convicted doping doctor is allowed to participate in the sport?Well, my eyeball certainly did not always match the panel's eyeballs back in the 6.0 days. Now my eyeballs match up with the panel's score-based placements the vast majority of the time. And when it's a bit off, and that happens sometimes, I can go to the protocol and find out why.
I have much more confidence in the judging system than I used to.
Good for you! Just curious...did you read Jon Jackson's book?For number 3 yes there is bias in figure skating - so much that I did my masters thesis on it!
Someone needs to do a thesis on the decline of figure skating...not only in the US but in other countries as well. It is a very complex issue IMHO.I watched a documentary about judging scandals, I don't remember what it was called, but it came out a few years ago. It analyzed the 2002 scandal. From this documentary, I got an impression that ISU pushed the blame onto the French judge, but the reasons that led her to forging the marks, the pressure that she experienced and what went behind the scenes was not exposed, and culpable people were not punished. Instead the ISU came up with IJS and anonymous judging. I had a feeling that Jamie Sale and David Pelletier, the victims of the 2002 situation, didn't get a closure. It's great to get the gold, but it would be much nicer if the wrongdoing were exposed and corrected. Initially, when the French judge confessed about biased judging, Skate Canada initiated an investigation, but as soon as the second set of gold medals was awarded, Skate Canada was satisfied and withdrew. The main benefactors of the situation were Berezhnaya and Sikharulidze, partly thanks to Tamara Moskvina. She insisted that they go to the repeat victory ceremony. The media took this favourably, and they took advantage of the hype, the two golden couples doing commercials and performing in shows together, and they all made a lot of money. Berezhnaya was the only person in the documentary looking completely at peace. The main losers of the situation were Anisina and Peizerat, in whose favour the deal was apparently made. Maybe they didn't make it, didn't themselves pressure the judge, but after the scandal they were shunned and couldn't monetize on their olympic win.
I remember my reaction to IJS: it used to be a set of marks, where you understood that 4.0-5.0 was = thanks for coming, >5 was not bad, keep trying, 5.5-5.8 was pretty good (depending on the situation), and 5.9-6.0 was a likely win. With IJS it was some 2 or 3 digit numbers with 2 digits after a decimal point, so five significant digits instead of two, and no benchmark: what number is good? It was a few years before I worked through the rule-book, because tables of base values and abbreviations like FCCoSp4 or SiSt3 is not what an aesthetically oriented viewer is looking for in figure skating. At some point I noticed it became more interesting for me to look through the protocols than to watch the actual skating. I'd come home in the evening, download a protocol of a comp, look through it and think: OK, all clear, I don't need to watch. I fast-forwarded step sequences, because as difficult as rockers and counters are, they do not look as interesting as some simple steps done with speed, spectacular split jumps, or Sasha-spirals. What I like about IJS is that it gives some idea of score dynamics for a skater, measurable scoring goals.
I think there were many contributing factors for figure skating popularity decline pre-IJS: among them economic difficulties, scandals, exodus of some popular skaters to pros, opening of Eastern Europe and ensuing travel and migration opportunities, development in telecommunication and advancement of internet where you could do other things, e.g. chat on-line with other figure skating supporters.![]()
And the Russian fans too. Which other countries is it pretty popular in?Skating used to be bigger than basket ball in the US. I think part of the puzzel can be solved in understanding WHY skating is still very popular with the lady fans of Japan.
I think that the first obstacle would be to narrow down this sprawling topic to focus on a manageable theme.Someone needs to do a thesis on the decline of figure skating...not only in the US but in other countries as well. It is a very complex issue IMHO.
We certainly agree that cultures move on, or basically change. However, this change has been so rapid in the time frame of my long life that it is almost frightening. I went to quite a few shows pre-2002. Paid lots of sheckels for front row seats on the ice, litterally. It started with getting the last seat due to a cancelation at a Champions on ice show in spokane. By 2002, when I saw my first comp in Spokane, I was hooked. Champions on ice did 93 shows that season alone. Not sure about Stars on ice.I think that the first obstacle would be to narrow down this sprawling topic to focus on a manageable theme.
Personally. I do not think that there is an answer to the question of why various pastimes come and go in public popularity. Cultures move on.
Canada is kind of a puzzel right now....when I went there for comps, attendance was good but it seemed to me many just went to support something Canadian. I will leave it to others to elaborate on attendance in this decade. Korea still seems to be well attended. While many can successfully argue their culture is vastly different than Japan's, I would argue that there are simularities and those are important.And the Russian fans too. Which other countries is it pretty popular in?
Me, too! Skate America, 2002! I had never seen anything like it.By 2002, when I saw my first comp in Spokane, I was hooked.
My last two events in Canada were ACI and Worlds (other than Nationals)Canada is kind of a puzzel right now....when I went there for comps, attendance was good but it seemed to me many just went to support something Canadian. I will leave it to others to elaborate on attendance in this decade. Korea still seems to be well attended. While many can successfully argue their culture is vastly different than Japan's, I would argue that there are simularities and those are important.
Plus Korea is now seeing the blossoming of the inspiration Yuna Kim gave to children at the height of her popularity, just as those inspired by Mao (sure, she wasn't the sole megastar in Japan the way Yuna was in Korea but there are quite a few including Shimada who name her as inspiration).Korea still seems to be well attended. While many can successfully argue their culture is vastly different than Japan's, I would argue that there are simularities and those are important.
The superstar effect is real and I dont deny that. But you look at the people who still follow Yuna and she isnt going away. Now, we have all sorts of interesting and wonderful Korean skaters and of course Japanese skaters. I wonder what happened to all the Hanyufans? Anyway, for me, it never was about one or two or 10 skaters that America was producing, it was about the body of work of the US but more than that, it was about the body of work of skaters all around the world. That was the cool things about Champions on Ice, and any international comp. That was the draw. My first comp was SA Spokane 2002. And the COMP was way cool of course as I had never been to one...but before that, there was Champions on ice...where all the stars I had watched on a rabbit ears vaccum tube analogue TV came to life. In 2000 Champions on Ice, there were 33 champions and in them, many legends....Plus Korea is now seeing the blossoming of the inspiration Yuna Kim gave to children at the height of her popularity, just as those inspired by Mao (sure, she wasn't the sole megastar in Japan the way Yuna was in Korea but there are quite a few including Shimada who name her as inspiration).
I was very surprised at the effect it had on me. I had seen MK in shows of course but never go out and win a comp. There were lots of other cool skaters but for me, seeing and feeling the drama of a comp was an incredible experience . Many years later, I even got my pic with Gracie in "Skating Magazine" LOL!Me, too! Skate America, 2002! I had never seen anything like it.![]()