Don't they have different rules now about re-starts after equipment failures?
It seems like the referee could have told Tonya, you have two minutes to fix your shoestring and get back out there. This happened to Michelle kwan at 2001 worlds qualifying.
Some of the rules have changed, yes. And some of them esp. in 1994 left some areas of discretion up to the referee.
IIRC, the biggest change is that skaters used to have the option of starting from the beginning of the program even if the judges were told to start judging at the point of interruption and now they have to start from the point of interruption so there isn't a sense of continuity.
Or something like that.
Otherwise, anyone who didn't like their draw for skate order could fake an equipment problem and skate later.
That would seem to be more trouble than it's worth. I don't think that would be more relaxing than just skating as planned.
Skating first after the warmup is not ideal because the skater is still out of breath if they use the full warmup time. Usually the first skater will stop early. But I don't see any advantage to using the full warmup time and then faking a problem in hopes that the ref will let her start later. These days, she probably wouldn't get that option and would just get disqualified.
Skating second is usually ideal -- time to recover from the full warmup but not enough time for the muscles to cool down again.
The later after the warmup you skate, the less benefit you get from the warmup. So delaying the performance even further by faking a problem would not be an advantage. And there isn't any way to fake a problem for your own equipment that would allow you to skate earlier.
Only the first skater after the warmup really has any incentive to want to delay.
I think at the 1998 Olympics everyone was on pins and needles not to seem like they were picking on Tonya. In case she was proven to be innocent in the plot against Kerrigan, the ISU wanted to make sure that she did not have any basis for a law suit.
1994, you mean, right? Yes, I think that is true.
Harding did get a little more benefit of the doubt in terms of being allowed to skate again at the end of the group. With another skater, the referee might have just said continue from where you left off or else withdraw.
As far as Chouinard goes, she didn't get any disadvantage that she wouldn't also have gotten from a completely innocent program interruption by a preceding skater. She would have had the same amount of time if Harding had withdrawn or been DQ'd.
I think the reason this was made a big deal of was because the networks were looking for any drama related to Harding they could find to play up. And lucky for them she provided some.
If the same thing had happened to a no-name skater in a tape-delayed broadcast, but they did plan to show that skater's performance, they might have shown the false start and the interruption and then summarized the problem and showed her full skate at the end of the group in chronological sequence. Or not even shown the false start at all and just shown the eventual full skate with an announcer informing viewers that there had been a problem with the lace earlier and the skater was allowed to skate at the end of the group.
Personally, I wish CBS had done that and kept enough broadcast time for figure skating to show Tanja Szewcenko's long program in the final group instead of "chacking" her. But they knew that Harding drama would be of more interest to casual viewers.
In a live broadcast, of course they have to show what's going on at the time (unless it's obviously going to be a long delay, or a short enough one they can just fill with a commercial break) because they don't know what the outcome will be.