I expect Ross will pull up from 14th when all is said and done and I agree in general about what is being said, however, the whole nationals results/scoring in general I think needs to be taken with a grain of salt. Bear in mind:
- the 6th place men's finisher at Nationals beat the silver medalist by 20 points at 4CC
- the men's pewter medalist and 8th place finisher at Nationals beat the silver medalist's 4CC score at JW by 14 and 10 points, respectively (with one less element)
- the 5th place lady's finisher at Nationals beat the silver medalist by 10 points and the bronze medalist by 18 points at 4CC
- the 8th place lady's finisher at Nationals beat the 6th place finisher by 15 points (and the pewter medalist by 2) at JW
Given this, I think it's fair to say US nationals results are a little questionable. Not to say that Miner didn't deserve to be 2nd at Nationals, but Farris did beat him on TES at Nationals, and then put up a considerably higher score at JW compared to Miner at 4CC. Dornbush didn't do well at Nats but beat Miner by 20 points at 4CC. Given that the placement of Miner over Farris at Nationals was due to PCS, in that case, Abbott may have well gotten 2nd at Nationals because internationally, the difference in Miner and Farris PCS is maybe a few points, but Miner vs Abbott is a lot more than a few points and a lot more than what the gap between the two at Nationals was. Zawadzki beat Gao at Nationals because of PCS too, then Gao scored way higher than Zawadzki at 4CCs, and even a little higher in PCS. Siraj did so well at Nationals because she got very high PCS, then at JW her marks were way lower and she winds up 11th with a sub-140 score. So, while it's not a travesty, the USFS just looks a little unwise regarding some of the decisions they make regarding team assignments and Nationals marks.
Eh, but soooo. I think Richard was generally favored over Ross, but then Richard ran into some bad luck for two seasons which has sorely damaged
his confidence. And, as I said both guys were majorly dissed internationally in 2011 which did nothing for either of them confidence-wise. Yet Ross managed to come back strong and steady in 2012, but no third spot available to go to Worlds, yet he still copped a NHK bronze, a U.S. bronze, and a 4CC bronze for 2011-12 season. That kept Ross' profile and his stock high with USFS who still very much supported Richard.
Okay so Richard started out very strong 2012-13 season but then began to falter with his consistency. I think that is a side-product of trying to develop and effectively train a quad. It changes timing and rhythm and endurance and mental capacity etc., etc. Unless you click with the quad seemingly right away like Chan and Reynolds, there can be a tendency to struggle. In any case, Richard had every opportunity to perform well at Nationals and he might have except for a nasty virus which depleted his strength. However, he didn't have much to show for his efforts internationally in the way that Ross had, so Ross had more buzz even if Richard is considered by some to be more well-rounded. So what about the scores at 4CC -- such a poorly scored comp, it's not even worth discussing how the marks were arrived at, except to say it proves nothing. Like I said, Richard was always slightly favored and he ran into bad luck and Ross has been more steady and successful, and lucky until a bit of nerves and shakiness showed up for Ross slightly at Nationals and more so at 4CC, which remember was only two weeks later (Max and Ross had no time to be solidly prepared).
Ross began the 2012-13 season with middling success (but very good programs) and then kapow Ross scores big time at NHK again grabbing bronze in a stacked field. Keep in mind that Ross successfully landed his new-found quad only in the fp, but it was a beautiful and steady fp and he was hugely rewarded in the marks. For some reason, Javi, who skated directly after Ross had a major meltdown which helped Ross win the bronze.
Interestingly, I believe that a lot of guys, especially Kevin Reynolds took a look at the scores given to Ross' fp at NHK and said, "Damn, I'm gonna get me some quads going, cuz if Ross can get scores like that with a quad, then surely I can too. And furthermore, what if I can get 3 quads and not meltdown like Javi did at NHK!?" There you have it, Kevin Reynolds, 2013 4CC champion and sitting in third place at Worlds 2013, in Canada no less. And ahem, Kevin Reynolds is a talented skater but aside from suddenly superman powers re quad, he's not drastically better skating skills-wise than Richard, or Ross, or Adam, and certainly Kevin's not better than Hanyu or Daisuke or Javi ... the list continues.
Josh Farris was NOT gonna do considerably better than Ross or Max at Worlds. Josh is better off being a Junior World champion and working his way onto the senior men's scene in 2013-14.
U.S. Nationals is unique and figure skating honchos everywhere are slow to adapt to changing times. That's an understatement. I think the problems are not only with TPTB selections, but with the scoring system and with the entire structure of how this sport is operated. There are too many talented skaters who never get any meaningful opportunity to develop. In order for the sport to grow, TPTB need to think differently. It's not only USFS that lacks vision.