- Joined
- Sep 14, 2008
The scores should have been close either way, but after watching the clearest video possible and taking the time to thoroughly examine the technical elements I'm quite upset with this result now. Sotnikova's footwork sequence had weak edges throughout the whole thing and really should not have gotten those crazy bonus marks for quality. Yu-Na Kim's footwork sequence was called as a Level 3 but I see no reason why it shouldn't have been called as a Level 4, after counting each and every step and rotation. Her execution of it was far better than what Sotnikova did as well.
That, combined with the underrotated jump Sotnikova didn't get called on AND the very bad PCS judging (I have to give Yu-Na extra credit for her speed in this performance and the sharpness of some of the arm movements I didn't get the full effect of in the previous video feeds), is just a ridiculous level of Russian bias.
That, combined with the underrotated jump Sotnikova didn't get called on AND the very bad PCS judging (I have to give Yu-Na extra credit for her speed in this performance and the sharpness of some of the arm movements I didn't get the full effect of in the previous video feeds), is just a ridiculous level of Russian bias.



