I would like to post something here for people who say Yuna played it safe with no triple loop and no double axel / Triple Toe loop;
Over the years, ISU rule book has not been on Yuna side - if anything, it was as if ISU found ways to bring down Yuna's mark.
1. Scale of Value
When someone is given GOE, let's say +1, when it is translated into an actual mark, it becomes calculated according to Scale of value - For a lutz jump, scale of value is 0.7 (based on 2013-2014 rulebook). So if you got +1 GOE for Lutz, you actually get 0.7 additional marks. Ever since Va
ncouver 2010 when Yuna received sky rocketed GOEs, ISU was scrutinized by (Japanese sponsors who were angry that Mao didn't win). So ISU decided to change the rule so that Scale of Value was lower. This was a huge disadvantage for skaters like Yuna who tends to get lots of points from high GOEs for her perfect execution of the elements.
2. Triple Axel base value increase
After Vancouver, ISU increased the base value for more "difficult jumps" (and they solely meant Triple Axel) - According to their logic, Triple lutz, second highest base value and the second most difficult triple jump after axel, should have gotten an increase too. But Lutz base value (Yuna's programs have many lutz) didn't increase. But only triple axel base value had an increase. Who is behind this? Massive Japanese sponsors' force, of course!! Mao benefits from this because, although she is a solid and strong skater, her success rate of landing a perfect triple axel has actually been very low - she either fell while doing the jump, or she under-rotated it most of the time. But judges have been generous with overlooking the under-rotation. Now that the base value of triple axel increased, Mao was able to get high points with Triple Axel, even with mistakes and deductions.
2. 2A-3T (Double Axel - Triple Toe Loop) vs 3S2T (triple salchow double toe loop)
This makes me really angry actually because 2A-3T used to be Yuna's own thing and her signature move - Back in Vancouver, Yuna had 2A-3T and back then, only Yuna could pull it off because it was a very difficult combination. In Vancouver, three 2A (double axels) in one program were allowed - So Yuna had 2A3T, 2A2T2Lo, and 2A - and this was said to be technically very difficult program. But after Vancouver, the rule changed so that three 2A were NOT allowed. So Yuna had to give up on one of the 2A and it ended up being 2A3T. She could have kept 2A3T and do 3F2T2Lo (triple flip, double toe, double loop - what Adelina did) but why should she give up on 2A2T2Lo which she has always been doing? Because of this, instead of 2A3T, Yuna had to settle for 3S2T (Triple Salchow double toe loop), which has less base value. Besides, Yuna has been suffering all kinds of chronic injuries, so why should she risk further injuries? Looking out for your body's capabilities is not playing safe - it's a strategy!!!
3. Triple Loop vs Triple Lutz
Some say (I think new york times article said this) Yuna lost because of not having a triple loop? But Yuna did extra triple lutz, which is technically more difficult and has higher base value - Adelina can't do lutz, by the way, due to her flutz habit (wrong edge lutz), but Yuna does not do Triple loop because of injuries.
So all in all, if Yuna was able to do 2A3T, (if the rule didn't prohibit!) Yuna would have had 2A3T, 2A2T2Lo, 2A, 3Lz - so basically technical base value would be close zero - evened out. The difference in 3F2T2Lo vs 2A2T2Lo (Yuna has less points here) would have been made up by Triple Lutz vs Triple Loop difference (Lutz has higher base value)!!
So who says Yuna played it safe? She was actually forced by the ISU rulebook!!