- Joined
- Aug 1, 2011
2014 Worlds - Short Dance
- Thread starter Ryan O
- Start date
I/K's twizzles did not score a single point. Zero. 0.
So if they had done it properly, it would be an additional 7-8 points in TES alone. Add to that a few points PCS they lost because of that error, and their score would be close to 75. So close to what they did in Sochi.
Before that twizzle happened, every single element was exquisite.
They were. Their PE was 0.3-0.5 points lower than other components. And how do you know how much they would scored if their SD was clean?
- Joined
- Sep 12, 2013
You are right re his being one of the best looking PEOPLE ever. How tall is he?
His hair is looking a little too shellacked- is that what you mean? Or do you think it is getting too long? If shellacked, I think he needs to take a little *less* care of it.
totally agree, he is really very very handsome
Hmmm, I was too busy observing his other fine attributes to notice details of his hair. Thanks hyperinflation, yet another good reason to watch the British Eurosport SD broadcast later:agree:
Generosity all around for them.
- Joined
- Jan 11, 2014
Whoever said I/K had a personal best in PCS is wrong. They were slightly higher at the Olympics. But only slightly.
One judge gave I/K a 9.75 for Performance. Guessing it'd've been a 10 then without the twizzle error.
C/B were the only team to hit all their levels.
One judge gave I/K a 9.75 for Performance. Guessing it'd've been a 10 then without the twizzle error.
C/B were the only team to hit all their levels.
Oh poor I/K, they got a 0.3 deduction in P/E.
How do you know that they would have 9.19 PE with clean skate? I sure don't.
And that's the fact: they are punished. If you think it's not enough, well...
- Joined
- Mar 25, 2014
What points did they lose in PCS? They got a 9.21 in skating skills despite bumping into each other! To me, if you can't avoid a collision on the ice your skills should not be getting top marks. Their performance/execution was given an 8.89 despite a glaring and disruptive mistake.
Whoever said I/K had a personal best in PCS is wrong. They were slightly higher at the Olympics. But only slightly.
One judge gave I/K a 9.75 for Performance. Guessing it'd've been a 10 then without the twizzle error.
C/B were the only team to hit all their levels.
oh you're right. I'm getting old.
- Joined
- Sep 14, 2008
The team ranked 29th got perfect base value for their Finnstep. Interesting.
Let's agree to disagree.
- Joined
- Jan 19, 2014
look matt k, i don't know how many times people have to say it to you or if someone literally has to beat you over the head with a hockey stick for you to process it because i gladly volunteer, but TES and PCS are irrevocably entwined in each other. if you mess up technically (or if in nikita katsalapov's case, if you straight up HINDENBURG it technically), then your PCS should suffer. their PCS did not suffer.
i don't know how much more sesame street i can make it for you
i don't know how much more sesame street i can make it for you
- Joined
- Aug 1, 2011
I very rarely have uhm, for the sake of this being a g-rated forum, let's call them "crushes" on athletes, but I did for Ingo Stauer and I definitely do for Mr Poje. Swoooooooooooooooooon (catch me Andrew! catch me!).
